The general welfare of a nation's people is a better indication of that nation's greatness than are the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists.
The issue that the general welfare of a nation's people is a better indication of that nation's greatness than are the achievements of its rulers, artists, and scientists is a contentious one. While each side has its strengths and weaknesses, I believe that nation's greatness can be measured only as a cumulative measure of achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists, and general welfare of its people. While both the measures are essential, it would be handicapped to neglect either of them.
A nation consists of people of all kinds not only rulers, artists, or scientists. So, the nation's greatness relates to the greatness of the people of the country. I think we can safely conclude that the greatness of the people can be measured by their welfare because when the welfare of people is neglected, there would be no happiness and in turn greatness. For example, when the welfare of people is not considered significant, and people are unhappy, it is unwise just to measure the achievements of a few people and conclude that the nation is great. Therefore, the general welfare of people is the better indication of that nation's greatness.
On the other hand, greatness can only be measured in terms of achievements. As the greatness of the nation relates to the greatness of the individuals who form the nation, it would make more sense to measure it in terms of their achievements. For example, when we say a nation is great, we actually mean the people are great which can be measured in terms of their accomplishments. Hence, the nation's greatness can be measured effectively in terms of the achievements of its people who collectively form the nation.
While both the sides are right, we can not neglect any side for the measurement of the nation's greatness. As the phrase nation's greatness is constituted of two words nation and greatness, it would not make sense to neglect either of them. For example, emphasis on nation without greatness or greatness without nation does not constitute nation's greatness. If a nation has a small percentage of celebrities who are achieving in their respective fields leaving the development or prosperity of people, we can not say that the nation is great. Similarly, if a nation is generally supportive of the peoples' welfare and there have been very few achievements, we can say that the nation is welfare, and we can not label it as a great one. Therefore, I believe both the welfare and achievements of people are important to indicate the greatness of the nation.
In conclusion, as the nation consists of people, and greatness indicates achievements, the welfare of people and their achievements play an equal role in the nation's greatness.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-14 | daddy_returns | 75 | view |
| 2019-05-02 | manikantanalla | 54 | view |
| 2019-01-18 | sumit2380 | 66 | view |
| 2019-01-17 | sumit2380 | 66 | view |
| 2019-01-17 | sumit2380 | 50 | view |
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones. 66
- 'The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station.“Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news. During this time period, most of 43
- schools should be responsbile only for teaching academic skills and not for teaching ethical and social values 50
- If a goal is worthy, then any means taken to attain it are justifiable. 50
- Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field. 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 87, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...s people is a better indication of that nations greatness than are the achievements of ...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 257, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...trengths and weaknesses, I believe that nations greatness can be measured only as a cum...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 91, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...rulers, artists, or scientists. So, the nations greatness relates to the greatness of t...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 631, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...people is the better indication of that nations greatness. On the other hand, greatn...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 394, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...ms of their accomplishments. Hence, the nations greatness can be measured effectively i...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 88, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...ect any side for the measurement of the nations greatness. As the phrase nations greatn...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 159, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
... achievements play an equal role in the nations greatness.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, hence, if, similarly, so, therefore, while, for example, i think, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2256.0 2235.4752809 101% => OK
No of words: 454.0 442.535393258 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96916299559 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61598047577 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96604039778 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 215.323595506 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.330396475771 0.4932671777 67% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 693.9 704.065955056 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 10.0 3.10617977528 322% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 7.0 1.77640449438 394% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6860901869 60.3974514979 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.736842105 118.986275619 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8947368421 23.4991977007 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.68421052632 5.21951772744 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.489066093469 0.243740707755 201% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.231344084506 0.0831039109588 278% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.139945453368 0.0758088955206 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.353903093491 0.150359130593 235% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.09056780653 0.0667264976115 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.8420337079 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.07 8.38706741573 84% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 100.480337079 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.