Government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve.
The speaker states that the government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve. I believe that in some cases the government should take judgments by their own but they also should consider the people's demand or point of views before making any significant decisions. Therefore, I agree the author's point to some extent.
Any democratic government is run by the people for the people of the country, and therefore, is expected to serve their people's goodwill and work to enhance and maintain their safety, basic necessities, economic conditions and well-being. In the process of serving their people, the government has to take many significant decisions. If the government officials only rely on their own judgment then the government will be no longer justified as democratic because the government officials are expected to serve their people but if they have to justify their judgment to anyone then I believe that the people's well-being would no longer be served, and whole country will be run by the government officials for their own mean and progress.
Let see an example, where a chemical factory which flood out toxic chemicals to nearby river which is harmful to residents over there then government officials have the responsibilities to think about people's health and put some considerable restrictions. By imposing restrictions, the company's production and overall growth may impede, but it was necessary to maintain a good health of people. Therefore, in that crucial situation, the officials should take decisions by considering people's view but not just their own judgment.
However, in many cases, people have different views on different things like, budget for public schools. Parents of children who go to private schools may believe that it is unnecessary investment by the government. But providing good education for people who cannot afford private schools is a right thing to do. Therefore, in some cases the officials must take right judgment to serve their people rather than considering some peoples' personal views.
All in all, peoples' personal views have diversity and therefore the government officials must consider these views and take judgmental decision accordingly.
- A recent study indicates that children living in the Himalayan mountain region in Nepal have lower levels of tooth decay than children living in suburban areas in the United States despite the fact that people in the Himalayan mountain region in Nepal rec 77
- Passage Altruism is a type of behavior in which an animal sacrifices its own interest for that of another animal or group of animals Altruism is the opposite of selfishness individuals performing altruistic acts gain nothing for themselves Examples of alt 93
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today 85
- A pet food company recalled 4 million pounds of pet food in response to complaints that pets that had consumed the food experienced vomiting lethargy and other signs of illness After the recall the pet food company tested samples from the recalled food an 58
- Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument Dr Benson is a renowned scientist known for his work in biochemistry and cardiology to est 53
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 185, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Suggestion: necessities
...k to enhance and maintain their safety, basic necessities, economic conditions and well-being. In...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, however, if, may, so, then, therefore, well, as to, in many cases, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 58.6224719101 73% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 12.9106741573 163% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1924.0 2235.4752809 86% => OK
No of words: 360.0 442.535393258 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34444444444 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84697695421 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 215.323595506 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.477777777778 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 579.6 704.065955056 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 85.4046789331 60.3974514979 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.428571429 118.986275619 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7142857143 23.4991977007 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.42857142857 5.21951772744 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.533652129391 0.243740707755 219% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.184455810838 0.0831039109588 222% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.205536467392 0.0758088955206 271% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.287506114329 0.150359130593 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.171422457083 0.0667264976115 257% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 14.1392134831 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.1639044944 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 100.480337079 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.