Government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Government officials are entrusted with the power to make decisions that affect the lives of millions of people. But how should they make these decisions? Should they rely solely on their own judgment, or should they also consider the will of the people they serve?
There are strong arguments on both sides of this debate. On the one hand, government officials are typically experts in their field and have access to a great deal of information that the public does not. This gives them a unique advantage in making complex decisions. For example, a government official tasked with developing a new economic policy would have access to data on economic trends, unemployment rates, and the impact of similar policies in other countries. This information would allow the official to make a more informed decision than a member of the public who does not have access to this type of data.
On the other hand, government officials are accountable to the people they serve, and it is important for them to be responsive to their needs. For example, if a government official is considering raising taxes, they should consider the impact this would have on their constituents. If the majority of their constituents are struggling to make ends meet, then the official may want to reconsider raising taxes.
In order to strike a balance between these two approaches, government officials should gather as much information as possible about the issue they are facing, including the opinions of their constituents. They should also carefully consider the potential consequences of their decision, both positive and negative. Once they have weighed all of the factors involved, they should make a decision based on their best judgment.
Of course, there will be times when government officials must make decisions that are unpopular with some or even all of their constituents. This is inevitable in any democracy. However, if government officials have made a good effort to understand the perspectives of their constituents and to make a decision that they believe is in the best interests of the public, then they should not be afraid to stand by their decision, even if it is not popular.
Ultimately, the best way for government officials to make decisions is to strive to strike a balance between relying on their own judgment and considering the will of the people. By doing so, they can make informed decisions that reflect the needs of both the public and themselves.
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts 66
- Claim It is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero Reason The reputation of anyone who is subjected to media scrutiny will eventually be diminished Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree o 66
- In order for any work of art for example a film a novel a poem or a song to have merit it must be understandable to most people 66
- Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student s field of study Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position 66
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 339, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ve and negative. Once they have weighed all of the factors involved, they should make a de...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, then, for example, of course, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 43.0 33.0505617978 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2072.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 408.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07843137255 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49433085973 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78372680917 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 215.323595506 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.436274509804 0.4932671777 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 640.8 704.065955056 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.0384341087 60.3974514979 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.052631579 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4736842105 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.21052631579 5.21951772744 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229751920188 0.243740707755 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0874997165203 0.0831039109588 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0698921164167 0.0758088955206 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153072641784 0.150359130593 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0583498681298 0.0667264976115 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 100.480337079 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.