Governments officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
I believe that wise official governors could carry out the policy dependent on his judgement, but in general cases, they should listen to public before taking any decision. They should take public opinion into consideration, but not to blindly follow the will of the people they serve.
If a president is judicious, then we could trust him or her. Because his or her decision is more insightful and perspective than ordinary people. For instance, Taiwan previous president Hsiang Ching-Kao, had achieved many construction effectively by his judgement. In his term, he had complete the first high-way in Taiwan, even that's a tough decision at a time for the sake of insufficient finance. Eventually, the high-way facilitated the economy growth of Taiwan and accordingly started economy booming.
In contrast, it could be impolitic, the governor carries out his policy without listening to it's people. For example, ten years ago, the education president of Taiwan government had widely established the colleges and universities, while some scholars opposed the decision by the declined birth rate expected in the following decades. Today, the number of students is only half of it was a decade ago, but the the number of colleges grow more than fifty percent. And this leads to many problems, such as some schools couldn't find students to sustain their finance and the degraded college degree, because the admission rate of college application becomes more than ninety percent. Therefore, at least in this case, the government should listen to the sound from public, not act arbitrary.
Unquestioningly carrying out the will of the society would cause a lot of problem and make inappropriate decision. For instance, the public vote in Taiwan has a question which says, do you agree with the policy abandoning nuclear electricity generator? This question is not helpful at all, because they could support abandoning it without adequate consideration of it's side effect, like increasing electricity fee by twice. If the government just take it and execute it, then it would be detriment to the economic growth of the nation. As a result, the government should not carry out the will of the society discretionary. Instead, they could take it into consideration and assess it by experts in that field.
In conclusion, the government is suggested to execute it's policy if it is smart. Else, it should listen to public and evaluate the side effect, but not just follow it blindly.
- Fifteen years ago Omega University implemented a new procedure that encouraged students to evaluate the teaching effectiveness of all their professors Since that time Omega professors have begun to assign higher grades in their classes and overall student 58
- In any field of endeavor it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement 59
- 78 The following appeared in a memo from the vice president of a food distribution company with food storage warehouses in several cities."Recently, we signed a contract with the Fly-Away Pest Control Company to provide pest control services at our f 75
- Governments should not fund any science research who consequences are unclear 83
- Claim In any field business politics education government those in power should step down after five years Reason The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership Write a response in which you discuss the extent to wh 62
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 217, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun construction seems to be countable; consider using: 'many constructions'.
Suggestion: many constructions
...resident Hsiang Ching-Kao, had achieved many construction effectively by his judgement. In his te...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 329, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...lete the first high-way in Taiwan, even thats a tough decision at a time for the sake...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 406, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...s only half of it was a decade ago, but the the number of colleges grow more than fifty...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 406, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...s only half of it was a decade ago, but the the number of colleges grow more than fifty...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 517, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
... to many problems, such as some schools couldnt find students to sustain their finance ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 66, Rule ID: A_LOT_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun problem seems to be countable; consider using: 'a lot of problems'.
Suggestion: a lot of problems
...out the will of the society would cause a lot of problem and make inappropriate decision. For in...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, first, if, so, then, therefore, while, at least, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, in general, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.3162921348 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2075.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 402.0 442.535393258 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16169154229 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47771567384 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84898424355 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522388059701 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 654.3 704.065955056 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.0876722509 60.3974514979 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.75 118.986275619 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.7 5.21951772744 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164995015896 0.243740707755 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0505761110101 0.0831039109588 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0529934750741 0.0758088955206 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0895512298447 0.150359130593 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.065064769161 0.0667264976115 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 100.480337079 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.