Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the exposure problems of the future.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be preferential and explain how these examples shape your position.
The governing body has to come up with measures to solve these problems and establish a reliable society for the citizens to live in. These problems that arise in a nation fall into two categories: Long-term (the ones that are prevailing in the country since a prolonged time or the ones that come to risk in far-future) and short-term (that the nation is facing in the present). In the stand that suggests what problem Of the two categories are to be attacked and eliminated, I would support on focusing the matter at hands rather than the issues anticipated to occur in the future time for 2 reasons.
The problems that the team of experts in the governing body's team anticipate are based on several factors. These factors could be accrued due to current day scenario of the nation or the factors that influenced the present day condition of the nation. Focusing on the problems that It is important to note that, these factors are crucial to time change. That is, as an instance, we can consider the anticipation of dreadful disease X that is expected to come into the country Because of infections from a neighboring nation versus eradicating a disease Y that has proliferated the country currently. Allocating national resources on matters of anticipating problems even before examining the likeliness of the ocurrance of such matters would be profligate.It is important for the nation to concentrate on addressing the problem from disease X rather than disease Y because, the other nation suffering from disease Y currently could have found measures to eradicate it. Also, any analysis on disease Y depends on current day science and Research carried out on its sources and consequences, which is not warranted to remain static.
Another example could be seen on giving preferences to drought issues versus issues relating to economy decline that is reported based on current day GDP and market value. measures are to be taken to control or heal the drought hit regions in the country rather than on focusing to Because of drought conditions are not addressed, this might further lead to waning of economy that strengthens the economy decline, and hence backfires in negative manner. Further more, the market value is highly volatile as It depends on other external factors rather than on internal factors.
On the contrast, a might argue that taking measures to tackle problems that are expected to occur, can provide more time to analyse the issue which helps in resolving it in a better and efficient manner. But this depends on factors and causes that are likely to Change in the near future with passage of time.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-16 | aryaStark326 | 66 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 757, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: It
...nce of such matters would be profligate.It is important for the nation to concentr...
^^
Line 9, column 173, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Measures
...ed on current day GDP and market value. measures are to be taken to control or heal the ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, then, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.3162921348 168% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 76.0 58.6224719101 130% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2193.0 2235.4752809 98% => OK
No of words: 442.0 442.535393258 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96153846154 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58517132086 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68236595554 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.472850678733 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 702.0 704.065955056 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 23.0359550562 135% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 75.5668713182 60.3974514979 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 156.642857143 118.986275619 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.5714285714 23.4991977007 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.64285714286 5.21951772744 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.2758426966 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139323800752 0.243740707755 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0534208884035 0.0831039109588 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0405161854703 0.0758088955206 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0860064357449 0.150359130593 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.030755833949 0.0667264976115 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 14.1392134831 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 48.8420337079 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 12.1743820225 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.08 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 100.480337079 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.8971910112 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 11.2143820225 128% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.7820224719 153% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.