Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
The issue looks a rather provocative, because it breaks the logic of things. The main question of this issue - where do today problems come from? The answer will be obvious as a sunny day. Today problems are born from anticipated problems from the future. Or, put it another, it is when a little fire begin to glow, it is not necessary to predict a great fire and try to extinguish it, when it burns seriously. Logically, it is much more easily to extinguish a little fire, not waiting for conflagration. Consequently, the given recommendation will cause a lot of problems, which could be avoided simply.
However, if consider the history of many countries, it begins to seem that a lot of governments follow the given recommendation. They often predict problems in future quite accurate, however, they do nothing to avoid it or relate possible troubles. This way of "solving problems' always is seen in international policy of countries. For instance, it pretty simple to analyze the history process, becuase it is clearly seen how problems emerged and how they grow to an enormous size. For example, the Hitler aggression towards Sudety. The notorious annexation was acted from the silent agreement of other countries. They preferred waiting the real conflict to act, but it was obvious and clear that the Sudety annexation is only the first step to the Second World War. Hence, there is the question - if other countries tried to solve the problem of Nazi Germany before the conflagration, would it be so drammatic for the world? Of course, such solution would casue great tensety in the region, however, it would allow avoiding horrible mascare, which followed then. Unfortunately, the history possesses a lot of such examples, when regional problems grew to world problems.
Consideration such policy as a possible way for political behavior is just criminal. The today world is replete with gigantic problems that should be solved accurately. Otherwise, it cause horrible consequences for future generations. For example, it is the ecological problem, the global warming, and water contamination and so on. If such "anticipating policy" is implemented, these problems will grow to irreparable scale. Hence, accordingly the example, it quiete obvious that such policy is not acceptable in the modern world, because it causes only more troubles than it solves.
To sum up, such short-sighed policy only creates much more challenging troubles than it solves. The today world has numerous problems that should be solved on the early stages of their development, otherwise, it is quite scary to think about the future of the world.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-19 | jason123 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | Himanshu Sharma | 66 | view |
| 2019-12-26 | tg763622253 | 58 | view |
| 2019-11-27 | mohan41 | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-26 | louisetse | 66 | view |
- The following appeared in a memorandum written by the vice president of Health Naturally, a small but expanding chain of stores selling health food and other health-related products."Our previous experience has been that our stores are most profitable in 50
- The council of Maple County, concerned about the county's becoming overdeveloped, is debating a proposed measure that would prevent the development of existing farmland in the county. But the council is also concerned that such a restriction, by limiting 70
- Recently we signed a contract with the Fly Away Pest Control Company to provide pest control services at our fast food warehouse in Palm City but last month we discovered that over 20 000 worth of food there had been destroyed by pest damage Meanwhile the 51
- Twenty years ago, Dr. Field, a noted anthropologist, visited the island of Tertia. Using an observation-centered approach to studying Tertian culture, he concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather than 70
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position 73
Comments
Essay evaluation report
will grow to irreparable scale.
will grow to an irreparable scale.
it quiete obvious that
it is quite obvious that
Sentence: However, if consider the history of many countries, it begins to seem that a lot of governments follow the given recommendation.
Description: A conjunction, subordinating is not usually followed by a verb, base: uninflected present, imperative or infinitive
Suggestion: Refer to if and consider
Sentence: For instance, it pretty simple to analyze the history process, becuase it is clearly seen how problems emerged and how they grow to an enormous size.
Error: becuase Suggestion: because
Sentence: Hence, there is the question - if other countries tried to solve the problem of Nazi Germany before the conflagration, would it be so drammatic for the world?
Error: drammatic Suggestion: dramatic
Sentence: Of course, such solution would casue great tensety in the region, however, it would allow avoiding horrible mascare, which followed then.
Error: tensety Suggestion: tensely
Error: casue Suggestion: case
Error: mascare Suggestion: No alternate word
Sentence: Hence, accordingly the example, it quiete obvious that such policy is not acceptable in the modern world, because it causes only more troubles than it solves.
Error: quiete Suggestion: quite
Sentence: To sum up, such short-sighed policy only creates much more challenging troubles than it solves.
Error: short-sighed Suggestion: shortsighted
---------------------
flaws:
1. Don't start to discuss the ideas from the introduction paragraph.
2. better to have 5 paragraphs. Try this pattern:
paragraph 1: introduction. Suppose we support side A.
paragraph 2: reason 1 + why reason 1 + example of reason 1 + a small conclusion (like advantages of reason 1 or comparisons if not reason 1).
paragraph 3: reason 2 + why reason 2 + example of reason 2 + a small conclusion (like advantages of reason 2 or comparisons if not reason 2).
paragraph 4: Admittedly, there are some advantages of side B. First, ... Second, .... However, there is no causation/relation.... I still support side A. ...first,....second.....
paragraph 5: conclusion -- reinforce the thesis.
-----------------------
No. of Grammatical Errors: 3 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 7 2
Double check grammar & spelling issues after essay writing.
-----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 3 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 7 2
No. of Sentences: 25 15
No. of Words: 429 350
No. of Characters: 2132 1500
No. of Different Words: 217 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.551 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.97 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.748 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 157 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 115 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 79 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 44 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 17.16 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.99 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.48 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.264 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.411 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.054 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The issue looks a rather provocative, be...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 154, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ue - where do today problems come from? The answer will be obvious as a sunny day. ...
^^^
Line 3, column 356, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'pretties'?
Suggestion: pretties
...l policy of countries. For instance, it pretty simple to analyze the history process, ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1136, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y possesses a lot of such examples, when regional problems grew to world problems...
^^
Line 5, column 185, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'causes'?
Suggestion: causes
...uld be solved accurately. Otherwise, it cause horrible consequences for future genera...
^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['accordingly', 'but', 'consequently', 'first', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'second', 'so', 'then', 'for example', 'for instance', 'of course', 'to sum up']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.215568862275 0.240241500013 90% => OK
Verbs: 0.155688622754 0.157235817809 99% => OK
Adjectives: 0.101796407186 0.0880659088768 116% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0698602794411 0.0497285424764 140% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0518962075848 0.0444667217837 117% => OK
Prepositions: 0.0898203592814 0.12292977631 73% => OK
Participles: 0.0319361277445 0.0406280797675 79% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.97015115804 2.79330140395 106% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0299401197605 0.030933414821 97% => OK
Particles: 0.00199600798403 0.0016655270985 120% => OK
Determiners: 0.0898203592814 0.0997080785238 90% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0179640718563 0.0249443105267 72% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0199600798403 0.0148568991511 134% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2664.0 2732.02544248 98% => OK
No of words: 431.0 452.878318584 95% => OK
Chars per words: 6.18097447796 6.0361032391 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55637350225 4.58838876751 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.37819025522 0.366273622748 103% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.287703016241 0.280924506359 102% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.213457076566 0.200843997647 106% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.122969837587 0.132149295362 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97015115804 2.79330140395 106% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 219.290929204 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522041763341 0.48968727796 107% => OK
Word variations: 59.5927321468 55.4138127331 108% => OK
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6194690265 121% => OK
Sentence length: 17.24 23.380412469 74% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.9676743758 59.4972553346 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.56 141.124799967 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.24 23.380412469 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.6 0.674092028746 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.94800884956 81% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.21349557522 96% => OK
Readability: 46.0103016241 51.4728631049 89% => OK
Elegance: 1.21582733813 1.64882698954 74% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.460419823348 0.391690518653 118% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.10109098913 0.123202303941 82% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.105960823869 0.077325440228 137% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.441735927863 0.547984918172 81% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.13310504981 0.149214159877 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.173267765678 0.161403998019 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101983321197 0.0892212321368 114% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.467263850128 0.385218514788 121% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0283321724044 0.0692045440612 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.338477503873 0.275328986314 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0769331364041 0.0653680567796 118% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.4325221239 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 16.0 5.30420353982 302% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88274336283 41% => OK
Positive topic words: 3.0 7.22455752212 42% => OK
Negative topic words: 10.0 3.66592920354 273% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.70907079646 37% => OK
Total topic words: 14.0 13.5995575221 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Minimum three arguments wanted.
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.