Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
What the government should focus on and how to improvement the work efficiency of government has always been the limelight. Due to the heavy work of government, some recommend that government should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future. Through scrutiny on this issue, I judge this recommendation to be quite valuable and feasible because it is advantageous in most circumstances, even though in some circumstances it dose have some disadvantages.
The most direct advantage the recommendation might bring is it would solve the problems the people are facing directly. Several big disasters happened in 2008 in China might be the good examples. At the beginning of that year, a heavy snow invaded the southern part of China. Many important facilities including the railway and the cables were frozen. Also, there was another disaster happened in May. A strong earthquake attacked Sichuan province, with a great number of buildings falling down and numerous people losing their lives. Just at the very point, our government focus almost all their attention in solving these immediate problems, which consequently made people's life get well as soon as possible.
Another benefit the recommendation might bring is the quicker development of the city, province or the country. Every student in China has learned an important affair in their history books. That is the famous policy called the reform and opening-up in 1978. Actually at that time, people in China face too many serious problems, such as culture restriction and low college admission rate. While, low economic development is the most emergent one. As a result, the reform and opening-up policy put economic development at the first place. And everyone in China has witnessed the rapid development of our country during the past 40 years. Owing to the solving of low rate of economic development, people in China are living a better life and believe in their government much more than before.
However, that is not to say that the government do not need to figure out the anticipated problems of the future. Actually, the government could get stuck in some big troubles if some anticipated problems is not properly solved. Admittedly, 40 years rapid economic development in China have brought serious environmental problems, which might not be that emergent but might become serious and break out one day. Knowing the problems of the recommendation does not damage its value. On the contrary, the government could adapt some measures to enhance its performance. For example, in order to solve the environmental problems, the government should encourage the development of the environmental-friendly industry and carry out some policies to protect the environment. In this way, the problematic side of the recommendation could be reduced to the least while the beneficial side could work better.
To sum up, the recommendation could bring desirable positive results so it deserves implementing. For better result, we should realize the disadvantages the recommendation might have and adopt relevant measures to overcome them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-19 | jason123 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | Himanshu Sharma | 66 | view |
| 2019-12-26 | tg763622253 | 58 | view |
| 2019-11-27 | mohan41 | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-26 | louisetse | 66 | view |
- TPO 47 60
- In recent years, many frog species around the world have declined in numbers or even gone extinct due to changes in their environment. These population declines and extinctions have serious consequences for the ecosystems in which frogs live; for example, 75
- Did bees (a type of insect) exist on Earth as early as 200 million years ago? Such a theory is supported by the discovery of very old fossil structures that resemble bee nests. The structures have been found inside 200- million-year-old fossilized trees i 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is important to know about events happening around the world, even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 68
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 501, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'doses'?
Suggestion: doses
...s, even though in some circumstances it dose have some disadvantages. The most ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 391, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...riction and low college admission rate. While, low economic development is the most e...
^^^^^
Line 17, column 85, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to implement'.
Suggestion: to implement
...sirable positive results so it deserves implementing. For better result, we should realize t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, consequently, first, however, if, may, so, well, while, for example, such as, as a result, on the contrary, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 58.6224719101 113% => OK
Nominalization: 30.0 12.9106741573 232% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2684.0 2235.4752809 120% => OK
No of words: 503.0 442.535393258 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33598409543 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73578520332 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04348889313 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 254.0 215.323595506 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504970178926 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 834.3 704.065955056 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.2370786517 133% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.4586397084 60.3974514979 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.4074074074 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6296296296 23.4991977007 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11111111111 5.21951772744 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239241763902 0.243740707755 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0605211802189 0.0831039109588 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0991613195961 0.0758088955206 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134926137317 0.150359130593 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0949807773033 0.0667264976115 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 14.1392134831 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.1639044944 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 100.480337079 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.