Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.
Government is always facing problems of this kind and that, present and prospective, plain and perplexing, and has to spend its energy on all these problems in order to build a harmonious and sustainable society. But whether government focuses more on immediate problems than on the anticipated ones of the future concerns the wisdom and strategy that government deals with the relation and sets a priority in order among them. Sometimes, it is difficult to delineate a clear bound if these problems are urgent or can be postponed because of their complexity and difficulty. So, it is the key for government to cope with them in a reasonable, scientific, far-reaching way.
As a matter of fact, there are some relations among problems that government faces——today's problems may recur in the future, while ones in the near or far future may more or less be on the surface at present or can be imagined. These problems, if not being taken seriously, would bring about unimaginable aftermaths. For this reason, it is necessary for government to consider in a thoughtful and tactical way to treat current and anticipated problems.
Admittedly, current problems need to take precedence over the future ones, or the consequences they produce are beyond government's control. There are a lot of examples, such as natural disasters, sudden public incidents, pandemic diseases, economic crisis, and so on. For example, government made rapid responses to the 2003 SARS epidemic, the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake and the 2014 Shanghai stampede, and the 2008 global financial crisis, summoning as many physical and human resources as possible to curb the diffusion and severity of calamity; provided that government did not react swiftly to all various sorts of sudden incidents, heavier losses in properties and lives would have multiplied, cascading down to fear and turmoil in the society, eventually government must pay bigger prices to regulate these situations, which are, even worse, out of control. However, the more government devotes to immediate problems, the less he pays closely attention to the future problems, which is only a stop-gap measure, trapped in the circulation mode of 'head hurt, treat head, feet hurt, treat feet', not beneficial to the solution of all problems.
In regard to this, when immediate problems occur, government should formulate measures to prevent such situations to repeat in the future, which means long-term policies to cope with diverse variables, anticipated or unanticipated. By careful consideration and tactical deployment about public health and security incidents and natural disasters, government should implement flexible policies to prevent them from occurrence or put them under control even if they outbreak. Nonetheless, faced with such anticipated problems as warming atmosphere, deterioration of ecology system, and economic sustainable development, government has to play a long game: beginning from now, this kind of problems must be solved step by step, until in the near future they will not pose a huge danger to human beings. But if not, a picture of the earth would appear——the ice sheets of the poles fast melt, sea level rises, diseases are rampant, extreme weathers are frequent, and the like, all of which seriously threatens human existence. Most importantly, if the earth, the only planet for human habitat, were disappearing owing to the devastation of human activities and the wear-out of its energy, government must start immediately to explore other possible planets so as to escape from earth in the future, just as many developed countries like America and European countries are exercising. So, it is wise for government to look forward what will happen.
In short, government should even the balance between the immediate problems and the anticipated or unanticipated ones so that he can efficiently solve the short-and-long-term problems at the least cost. Only at a macro and strategic level does government confront all kinds of problems at leisure.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-19 | jason123 | 50 | view |
2020-01-18 | Himanshu Sharma | 66 | view |
2019-12-30 | PFF TAHSAN | 50 | view |
2019-12-26 | tg763622253 | 58 | view |
2019-12-06 | sudesh tiwari | 58 | view |
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. 50
- Claim: the best way to understand the character of a society is to examine the character of the men and women that the society chooses as its heroes or its role models.Reason: heroes and role models reveal a society’s highest ideals. 70
- People who are the most deeply committed to an idea or policy are also the most critical of it 38
- The luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life prevent people from developing into truly strong and independent individuals. 66
- Unfortunately, in contemporary society, creating an appealing image has become more important than the reality or truth behind that image. 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1253, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...ately to explore other possible planets so as to escape from earth in the future, just a...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, may, nonetheless, so, while, as to, for example, in short, kind of, such as, as a matter of fact, in regard to, more or less
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 37.0 14.8657303371 249% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 89.0 58.6224719101 152% => OK
Nominalization: 31.0 12.9106741573 240% => Less nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3402.0 2235.4752809 152% => OK
No of words: 635.0 442.535393258 143% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35748031496 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.01988110783 4.55969084622 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01027401469 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 330.0 215.323595506 153% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51968503937 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 1050.3 704.065955056 149% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.740449438202 135% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 8.0 1.77640449438 450% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 33.0 23.0359550562 143% => OK
Sentence length SD: 119.821520087 60.3974514979 198% => OK
Chars per sentence: 179.052631579 118.986275619 150% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.4210526316 23.4991977007 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.78947368421 5.21951772744 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323187045484 0.243740707755 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0965502449087 0.0831039109588 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0855977716855 0.0758088955206 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192882015573 0.150359130593 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0708565347864 0.0667264976115 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.5 14.1392134831 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.52 48.8420337079 60% => It means the essay is relatively harder to read.
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.3 12.1743820225 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.4 12.1639044944 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.38706741573 112% => OK
difficult_words: 165.0 100.480337079 164% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 11.2143820225 136% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.