Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Governments should definitely target the present problems rather than keep preparing for the problems which may arise in the future. There are many reasons behind this. Mainly, small problems of today can turn into huge problems of tomorrow. Moreover, to keep citizens of a country happy and satisfied, it is necessary to focus on even the smallest of ongoing problems.
Firstly, it is easy to tackle a problem when it is in inchoate stage. A problem ignored can grow like a behemoth. It can even lead to problems of many other kinds. So, obviously it will become too tough to tackle it at a later stage. For example, people in Tamil Nadu started complaining about increased water cuts. Had the government considered it a need of the hour, the present day situation where groundwater there has almost finished, would not have reached. There was another case in which many children died recently in Muzzafarpur. Had the government considered it as a pressing issue and provided more support for the medical facilities in the area, the fate of the children would have been altered positively.
Furthermore, government’s actions of ignoring the ongoing problems will definitely lead to unrest in the country. If the problems of citizens are not being solved within a stipulated amount of time, they will definitely resort to violent means like holding protests and demonstrations. The citizens will not understand the pleas of the government supporting far-sighted approach. Like in India, it has actually become a common sight these days people holding protests against the government’s inability to cut down the number of rape cases in the country. Obviously no one will think about the fact that government is focusing on global warming which will show deleterious effects after 30 years or so.
Lastly, such an action will prove harmful to the government in that it won’t be re-elected in the proceeding term. On the contrary, preparing for the future can prove even beneficial at later stages. For example, the government can devise plans to find out alternate renewable sources of energy to make up for the vanished coal in near future. But the present problems like water paucity in many areas need to be solved first. There is no point in ignoring the abysmal present while working for a benign future.
All the points stated above clearly underscore the fact that present problems should be given cardinal importance over problems of future. If the government wants a peaceful country where everything runs smoothly, it has to resort to solving immediate problems in the country.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-19 | jason123 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | Himanshu Sharma | 66 | view |
| 2019-12-26 | tg763622253 | 58 | view |
| 2019-11-27 | mohan41 | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-26 | louisetse | 66 | view |
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station. 59
- Super Screen Movie Production Company 43
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition. 54
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 54
- All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.Write a response in which you discu 50
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, lastly, may, moreover, so, while, as to, for example, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 14.8657303371 34% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 58.6224719101 111% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2188.0 2235.4752809 98% => OK
No of words: 427.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12412177986 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54576487731 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78929500445 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526932084309 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 678.6 704.065955056 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.0871904173 60.3974514979 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.1666666667 118.986275619 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7916666667 23.4991977007 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.875 5.21951772744 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 5.13820224719 272% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230949807079 0.243740707755 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0656100941061 0.0831039109588 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0659094779723 0.0758088955206 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147779288844 0.150359130593 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.067279854552 0.0667264976115 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 14.1392134831 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.12 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 100.480337079 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.8971910112 46% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.