Pieces of art are not only pacifies the mind but also serves as a channel to depict cultural ideas, represent world trends. Throughout history, diverse cults of artists have displayed their panache adeptness through their masterpieces depicting the richness of their thoughts. In the contemporary world scenario, governments tend to sanction a meagre amount of budget funds that is necessary to sustain art and promote further growth. As the allocated funds for military remains the highest fraction of the total investment in most of the powerful countries agenda, the same amount of resources might not be required for arts per se. Thus, a moderated sum of investment might be wise.
Firstly, the far-reaching effects of art should be duly studied. Its affect can range from imperceptible changes in our mindsets to a complete transformation of our perceptive. Consider the use of caricatures employed for lampooning a political subject. These funny ideas convey a profound amount of information that would have been impossible to do by using newspaper articles, magazines, speeches or television broadcasts.
In addition to the sweeping purview of art, its contribution to the nation's overall growth and integrity has to be taken into perspective. It gives employment from the street artists, university students, cherished masters to the workers in the national museums, literary centers and other cultural fairs that are routinely organized. Art also impacts the foreign trade adding further to the national economy. In helping to establish a unified collective identity for the people on a national to the global front, it imparts a strong cultural and a moral influence. The sense of a coalesced whole is especially needed in times of trouble for the country.
Although, it is wise enough to allocate more funding to art as a discipline, investing as much as in military is impolitic in most cases. Issues requiring urgent solutions, that are higher on the priority scale must be dealt first. Eradicating hunger, providing clean water to all citizens is more important than giving a national identity to the individuals. To keep up with the international developments in all subjects especially technology is a must for any country to stay intact and be able to tackle hostile forces due to the interconnecting nature of the internet.
In sum, allocating a higher budget lesser than that of the military is the way to go for most nations. Developed countries have to give higher preference for more
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company."According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than in any 35
- A pet food company recalled 4 million pounds of pet food in response to complaints that pets that had consumed the food experienced vomiting, lethargy, and other signs of illness. After the recall, the pet food company tested samples from the recalled foo 59
- governments should invest as much as in the arts as they do in the military 79
- The following appeared in a memorandum from the owner of Movies Galore, a chain of movie-rental stores."Because of declining profits, we must reduce operating expenses at Movies Galore's ten movie-rental stores. Raising prices is not a good option, since 52
- The following appeared in a letter from the faculty committee to the president of Seatown University:A study conducted at nearby Oceania University showed that faculty retention is higher when professors are offered free tuition at the university for thei 54
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 549, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...otal investment in most of the powerful countries agenda, the same amount of resources mi...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, so, thus, as to, in addition, in most cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 33.0505617978 48% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2115.0 2235.4752809 95% => OK
No of words: 403.0 442.535393258 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24813895782 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48049772903 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97737178019 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 215.323595506 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595533498759 0.4932671777 121% => OK
syllable_count: 665.1 704.065955056 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.3169102964 60.3974514979 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.75 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.15 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.7 5.21951772744 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178789756729 0.243740707755 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0464045650602 0.0831039109588 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0615170927332 0.0758088955206 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0814454732258 0.150359130593 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0400890829418 0.0667264976115 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 14.1392134831 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 48.8420337079 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.15 8.38706741573 121% => OK
difficult_words: 141.0 100.480337079 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 79.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.