Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
Sometimes, Science and Technology is the key to all the existing problems currently in the world.
The solution for that problem already exists out there, but its our job to find and pursue the solution, for this there are scientific researches and studies always happening. The researches are done by very professional and pundit scientists and researchers, but tasks like this require huge amount of funding either sometimes a private company based firm or sometimes by the government but there is always a sanguine outcome or some information gained by this research.
Taking account of the recent times, the covid 19 virus which is ubiquitous and threatening, taking lots of innocent lives around the world is now mitigated by vaccines which are created for these viruses. Lots of doctors, scientists, researches have put in their best efforts and time to create this vaccine but imagine if the government itself is not providing sufficient funds for this research, even though at the start consequences are unclear but the person sitting behind the research is professional and knows the task and what they are doing is for the betterment of the country, the government should provide funds for research like this which would lead to a fruitful outcome.
The advances in every field are done by some study or research behind that topic, take for an example the medical field, the vaccine for corona virus or the eradicated disease of small pox.
Today, the world is free of small pox just because the work done by the doctors out there who gave their everything, researched meticulously about small pox and finally found a cure. Researches like this if not backed or espoused by the government would go in vain and maybe the world would still be filled with the cases of small pox. The funding of government is of huge help to any small industry who is close to finding a cure but are restrained by just funds, who has no one else to back them and provide money, in such cases government should help to make them one step closer to their goal.
Few years ago, India became the first nation to reach the Martian orbit by sending their man made probe to collect information and unknown findings about the planet Mars. This was a very big thing for the whole astronomy community. Many researches and countless hours were spent on this mission, the funds required for this amount were myriad, ISRO were obviously able to collect most of the funds because being such big organization but Indian government definitely helped in funding the mission, even though consequences of the research were unknown.
In the end, instances and developments like this show that funding any scientific research even though the consequences are unknown to us but has the potential to produce a buoyant result, definitely pays off and after a well perusal of the work there is no harm in helping the organization by funding them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-03 | guozhishan | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-22 | raghavchauhan619 | 83 | view |
| 2021-10-16 | hemz26 | 75 | view |
| 2021-10-07 | SHADMIN | 66 | view |
| 2021-09-24 | makiato | 50 | view |
- Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting your position you should co 75
- Claim An piece of information referred to as a fact should be mistrusted since it may well be proven false in the future Reason Much of the information that people assume is factual turns out to be inaccurate Write a response in which you discuss the exte 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 61, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...t problem already exists out there, but its our job to find and pursue the solution...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, may, so, still, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 29.0 14.8657303371 195% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 58.6224719101 104% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2431.0 2235.4752809 109% => OK
No of words: 495.0 442.535393258 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91111111111 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71684168287 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57718241439 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 250.0 215.323595506 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505050505051 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 744.3 704.065955056 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 38.0 23.0359550562 165% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 105.775971813 60.3974514979 175% => OK
Chars per sentence: 187.0 118.986275619 157% => OK
Words per sentence: 38.0769230769 23.4991977007 162% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.46153846154 5.21951772744 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.97078651685 141% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161316155262 0.243740707755 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0569228672167 0.0831039109588 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.041693603285 0.0758088955206 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0765918934244 0.150359130593 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0458568090338 0.0667264976115 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.7 14.1392134831 146% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.37 48.8420337079 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.9 12.1743820225 139% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.79 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.2 11.2143820225 153% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.