One of the most important and complex phases of life that, in addition to enhance knowledge, shapes a human being, contributes for an all-round development and growth, associates him with the highly functioning world, is college. College education goes beyond books, molding the person, both physically and mentally, shaping and focusing on his career. With more and more students embracing higher education, the state stands to benefit economically, prosper culturally and in terms of new leaders from today’s youth force. Nevertheless, do every student who enroll in higher education come from economically firm backgrounds? Given the rising cost of education and vast majority of the population belonging from middle class families, how is it possible that this basic question of relaxing the tuition fees has escaped the minds of policy makers? Thus, every Government should strive to make university education free for students who have been enrolled, but cannot pay the tuition fees.
To be educated is our right, and to educate is our duty. It is this fundamental law which now has been monetized and been turned into a money laundering scheme- an opportunity for tax collectors and investors to extort money from students and professionals alike. With this gradual trend, we oversee how important education today is to a country and to its people. It is the educated force, who creates all the difference, and not merely money- as without education and proper knowledge, development will lose its trail and money will become futile. Hence, a Government, as its fundamental duty towards its citizen, should encourage university education, without burdening the students, especially the needy ones, with the liability of tuition fees.
Exempting the students from tuition costs of university education will have advantages manifold. There will be an inevitable increase in the number of students opting for higher education- especially those with merits but not with enough funding. This will provide the State a continuous stream of well professional engineers, doctors, theorists, artists, thinkers, writers and revolutionists, among the many. With sound education, these people can positively contribute towards the society – in fields of advancement of technology, health research, increase in aesthetic values, literary works, towards deeper understanding of the past and future, and bringing in changes. Students, thus can be encouraged to pursue higher education for positively contributing towards research and development, or academics. Hence, a nation stands to benefit, in all aspects, raising the potential of people and itself in general, thus welcoming a “smarter economy”.
On the contrary, education comes at a great price. University education costs soar due to inclusion of newer labs, advanced technology, securing patents, getting new projects and research subjects. Without charging the students the tuition fees, the cost to state will rise to an unexpected value. Private universities, unlike having a support from Governments for most public universities, will not be able to remunerate the faculties. Quality of education will droop, and the overall benefits will observe a gradual plunge. Policy makers, before passing the bills of free university education, should therefore, examine the situation with greater care and deeper contemplation.
With an increase in number of students applying for redemption from tuition fees, a proper background examination deems to be obligatory for the universities. Consideration should be done strictly on the basis of merit and low family income groups. Tie – ups with university students to serve and contribute, maybe in terms of academics, research or money, to their alma mater after they have flourished and established themselves, will no doubt help to regain the cost to university per students. Meanwhile, grants and funds for research can be channelized from students placed in big industries and research groups.
Implementing the bills for free higher education for the low income background students, undoubtedly, will foster merit and greater encouragement towards pursuing masters, PhDs, or even post-doctoral researches, must however be done after careful scrutiny, as it involves an enormous amount of money, investment of energy, years of research, and an ultimate aim for the versatile development of the nation in the long run, which if achieved, will escalate the nation’s respect among peers. After-all, education is the sole instrument for evolution and progress.
- Formal education tends to restrain our minds and spirits rather than set them free. 58
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In deve 50
- Educational institutions should actively encourage their students to choose fields of study that will prepare them for lucrative careers.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supp 66
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 83
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 12, column 430, Rule ID: IF_IS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'is'?
Suggestion: is
...nt of the nation in the long run, which if achieved, will escalate the nation’s re...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'nevertheless', 'so', 'therefore', 'thus', 'well', 'while', 'in addition', 'in general', 'no doubt', 'on the contrary']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.287327478043 0.240241500013 120% => OK
Verbs: 0.127979924718 0.157235817809 81% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0865746549561 0.0880659088768 98% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0363864491844 0.0497285424764 73% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0213299874529 0.0444667217837 48% => OK
Prepositions: 0.120451693852 0.12292977631 98% => OK
Participles: 0.0539523212045 0.0406280797675 133% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.96760418566 2.79330140395 106% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0238393977415 0.030933414821 77% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0853199498118 0.0997080785238 86% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0263488080301 0.0249443105267 106% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00878293601004 0.0148568991511 59% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 4580.0 2732.02544248 168% => OK
No of words: 695.0 452.878318584 153% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.58992805755 6.0361032391 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.13447686263 4.58838876751 112% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.464748201439 0.366273622748 127% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.358273381295 0.280924506359 128% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.270503597122 0.200843997647 135% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.198561151079 0.132149295362 150% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96760418566 2.79330140395 106% => OK
Unique words: 369.0 219.290929204 168% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530935251799 0.48968727796 108% => OK
Word variations: 70.8598173583 55.4138127331 128% => OK
How many sentences: 29.0 20.6194690265 141% => OK
Sentence length: 23.9655172414 23.380412469 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 83.5052811847 59.4972553346 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 157.931034483 141.124799967 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9655172414 23.380412469 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.51724137931 0.674092028746 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.94800884956 121% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.21349557522 19% => OK
Readability: 59.7928553709 51.4728631049 116% => OK
Elegance: 2.48648648649 1.64882698954 151% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.36418708418 0.391690518653 93% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0846950341196 0.123202303941 69% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0482471853508 0.077325440228 62% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.498947121255 0.547984918172 91% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.13254912993 0.149214159877 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141350822171 0.161403998019 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0537423793263 0.0892212321368 60% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.384567965689 0.385218514788 100% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0423110147188 0.0692045440612 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.255220538357 0.275328986314 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0457659802848 0.0653680567796 70% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 24.0 10.4325221239 230% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.30420353982 38% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88274336283 61% => OK
Positive topic words: 20.0 7.22455752212 277% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.66592920354 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.70907079646 111% => OK
Total topic words: 25.0 13.5995575221 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations to cover all aspects.