In this technology-based society, the development of science has already become one of the most frequent topics. Most people believe that the regulation to the science research from government is necessary for the consideration in various aspects. From my perspective, however, while admitting the necessity of government regulation to the research, I believe those constraints should only be established in order to prevent some problems which would cause the great impact to the whole society.
The constraint on the research do make sense to some extant since a considerable of problems would occur without the proper supervision from the government. The power of technology can be dangerous in some specific situations. The clone technology, for instance, could incur great social controversies if it was applied to clone the human for some medical use such as offering health organs for dying patients. Besides those classical problems happened in the science fiction novels, another biological technology,the famous genetic technology, has already caused detectable changes in the natural environment. Namely several artificially changed genetic order of the maize has been detected in the several wild species, meaning the possible genetic pollution. In this cases, human race should be wary about the potential dangerous effect of researches in several field and formulate regulation in those field to preclude possible disasters.
Nevertheless, adding excessive regulation to the research is another radicalism. The science history in the middle age has already reveals the negative effect caused by the blunt restriction to the science from the religion and authority. Another example is the China. Instead of paying attention to the science, people in power in each dynasty of China pursue to solid their dominance, which might accounts why while there are so many discovery can be traced back to the China, like the first use of oil, China still remain low technology power before the World War I. Consequently, the excessive regulation could press the science from developing.
Finally, taking all the advantages and disadvantages into consideration, the mild method is press the harmful side of the research without suppressing the development of science is to establish a commitee formed by the leading experts from different academic areas to access the risk of researches in the different field, and publish the appropriate rules to eliminate the possibility of the negative effect caused by unsupervised risky researches.
To wrap it up, we should add as few as regulation to the research while keeping an eye on the potential threat from several dangerous researches in special fields. Several research in specific field could pose great threat to the wild animal and biological diversity, so they should be restricted until their harmlessness can be guaranteed. In order to make the reasonable regulations, we should found a commitee formed by the cutting-edge experts to discuss and formulate those rules.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain. 66
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed 89
- “Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places” 54
- TPO-47 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is important to know about events happening around the world, even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 228, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... dangerous in some specific situations. The clone technology, for instance, could i...
^^^
Line 3, column 514, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...on novels, another biological technology,the famous genetic technology, has already ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 612, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Namely,
...ble changes in the natural environment. Namely several artificially changed genetic or...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 765, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ning the possible genetic pollution. In this cases, human race should be wary about ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 857, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun field seems to be countable; consider using: 'several fields'.
Suggestion: several fields
...ntial dangerous effect of researches in several field and formulate regulation in those field...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 432, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun discovery seems to be countable; consider using: 'many discoveries'.
Suggestion: many discoveries
...h might accounts why while there are so many discovery can be traced back to the China, like t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 73, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es and disadvantages into consideration, the mild method is press the harmful sid...
^^
Line 11, column 165, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[8]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun research seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'some research'.
Suggestion: Some research
...dangerous researches in special fields. Several research in specific field could pose great thre...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, consequently, finally, first, however, if, nevertheless, so, still, while, as to, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.3162921348 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 74.0 58.6224719101 126% => OK
Nominalization: 28.0 12.9106741573 217% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2577.0 2235.4752809 115% => OK
No of words: 468.0 442.535393258 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50641025641 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65116196802 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99223661897 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 215.323595506 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514957264957 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 807.3 704.065955056 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 92.5886962143 60.3974514979 153% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.166666667 118.986275619 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 23.4991977007 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.22222222222 5.21951772744 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 10.2758426966 19% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142327105864 0.243740707755 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0455754168711 0.0831039109588 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0501641935088 0.0758088955206 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0859656480718 0.150359130593 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0563830606435 0.0667264976115 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 14.1392134831 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 48.8420337079 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.1743820225 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.1639044944 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 129.0 100.480337079 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.