The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them, not by their contemporaries.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The greatness of individuals can be decided by their contemporaries. The greatness of individuals is not decided by only those who live after them. But, there are few individuals whose greatness was known by the people who lived after them but not their contemporaries.
Firstly, let us consider the case of the American president Abraham Lincoln. The greatness of him was initially known by his contemporaries by observing few situations which occurred when he was the American president. He has proposed the abolition of slavery in America and fought for the equality of all the people in America. He handled situations carefully by making important decisions during the American Civil War. These situations helped in proving in his greatness to his contemporaries.
Secondly, let us consider the case of freedom fighters like Jawahar Lal Nehru, Rani Laxmi Bai who struggled for the Indian Independence. Their greatness was known to their contemporaries and the people who lived after them when India has achieved its independence.
Thirdly, let us consider the case of Steve Jobs. His greatness is known by his contemporaries due to the fame achieved by the Apple company. The greatness of Mark Zuckerberg is known to his contemporaries because of the increased usage of facebook, one of the popular social media app, by many users.
However, the greatness of few individuals have been decided by people who lived after them. For instance, consider the case of Galileo's contribution in the physics field. His greatness was found by the people who lived after him but not by his contemporaries. He has stated that earth is not the center of universe and the sun is the center of the universe. Initially people did not believe him and his greatness was known to the people who lived after him when they conducted experiments to prove this statement. His contribution in the physics field has helped many scientists later in their contributions.
The greatness of individuals can be mostly decided by his contemporaries but not by the people who live after them. However, there are few cases where the greatness of individuals was decided by the people who lived after them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-15 | s.sim | 50 | view |
| 2023-01-02 | Kuldip851 | 66 | view |
| 2022-10-04 | SUDIPTA BARUA | 62 | view |
| 2022-07-22 | yomi idris | 62 | view |
| 2021-12-26 | ulligadda sreeja | 50 | view |
- Humans arrived in the Kaliko Islands about 7 000 years ago and within 3 000 years most of the large mammal species that had lived in the forests of the Kaliko Islands had become extinct Yet humans cannot have been a factor in the species extinctions becau 45
- The following appeared in a memorandum from the owner of the Juniper Caf a small local coffee shop in the downtown area of a small American city We must reduce overhead here at the caf Instead of opening at 6 a m weekdays we will now open at 8 a m On week 53
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and the academic world Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely Discuss both these views and give 67
- Homes in the northeastern United States where winters are typically cold have traditionally used oil as their major fuel for heating Last year that region experienced twenty days with below average temperatures and local weather forecasters throughout the 55
- The best way to solve environmental problems caused by consumer generated waste is for towns and cities to impose strict limits on the amount of trash they will accept from each household Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree 50
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 12.4196629213 16% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 33.0505617978 118% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1828.0 2235.4752809 82% => OK
No of words: 358.0 442.535393258 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1061452514 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0160872414 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 215.323595506 65% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.391061452514 0.4932671777 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 572.4 704.065955056 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.725852523 60.3974514979 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 87.0476190476 118.986275619 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0476190476 23.4991977007 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.80952380952 5.21951772744 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.2758426966 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 16.0 4.83258426966 331% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243148059667 0.243740707755 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102908264623 0.0831039109588 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105378668068 0.0758088955206 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167719808249 0.150359130593 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105701542459 0.0667264976115 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.35 8.38706741573 88% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 100.480337079 65% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.