"The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them, not by theircontemporaries."

Essay topics:

"The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them, not by their
contemporaries."

The speaker contends that the individual's greatness is discerned by the those who live after that person and not by those who lived in that particular era. I concede that his contention finds considerable support from areas, particularly those of physical sciences, where any finding is put to rigorous scrutiny before declaring it ubiquitous.
However the claim is an unfair generalization and fails to substantiate enough support empirically especially in the field of art. Thus, i generally disagree with the speaker.

Lending credence to my explanation, first of all, i would like to point out that artistic greatness can be judged at the face value. History is well stocked up with exemplary evidences. Michelangelo's artistic greatness was recognized by Pope at the very nascent stage. Monarchs of Europe were very happy with Mozart's art and gave him their most generous commissions.
Mark twain became the best-selling author and household name even during his lifetime. Consequently, it is pretty obvious that for crediting the artisan’s artistic acumen, one doesn't need to wait for getting it approved. In all these examples, the work was embraced by the contemporaries.

Admittedly, greatest achievement of an individual sometimes, especially in the field of physical sciences, needs to be put to careful scrutiny before it can be made universal. In addition a theory may or may not fulfill the requirements to serve as a springboard for later technological advances. To illustrate this, let’s take the example of this new theory called 'Spring theory'. Scientists claim that it reconciles the two opposing theories namely: quantum theory and wave theory. However for the new theory's claim to be successful and widely adopted, it needs to be tested over time.

In sum, the speaker overlooks the greatness of some important artistic individuals, who were recognized during their time.
Nevertheless, the speakers claim cannot be disregarded fully as scientific findings cannot be certified by the contemporaries and need fair bit of judgment by those who follow them.

Votes
Average: 1 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2016-09-03 shivang070 10 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 31, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
The speaker contends that the individuals greatness is discerned by the those who...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...utiny before declaring it ubiquitous. However the claim is an unfair generalization a...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 51, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...edence to my explanation, first of all, i would like to point out that artistic g...
^
Line 7, column 181, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...the artisan's artistic acumen, one doesnt need to wait for getting it approved. I...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 11, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ', the greatest'.
Suggestion: , the greatest
...ced by the contemporaries. Admittedly, greatest achievement of an individual sometimes,...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 180, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...iny before it can be made universal. In addition a theory may or may not fulfill the req...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 489, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...namely: quantum theory and wave theory. However for the new theorys claim to be success...
^^^^^^^
Line 12, column 182, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t of judgment by those who follow them.
^^^^^^

Discourse Markers used:
['consequently', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'nevertheless', 'so', 'thus', 'well', 'in addition', 'first of all']

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.220430107527 0.240241500013 92% => OK
Verbs: 0.172043010753 0.157235817809 109% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0752688172043 0.0880659088768 85% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0725806451613 0.0497285424764 146% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0376344086022 0.0444667217837 85% => OK
Prepositions: 0.118279569892 0.12292977631 96% => OK
Participles: 0.0510752688172 0.0406280797675 126% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.09228602873 2.79330140395 111% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0295698924731 0.030933414821 96% => OK
Particles: 0.00537634408602 0.0016655270985 323% => OK
Determiners: 0.0994623655914 0.0997080785238 100% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0188172043011 0.0249443105267 75% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0134408602151 0.0148568991511 90% => OK

Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2102.0 2732.02544248 77% => OK
No of words: 327.0 452.878318584 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.42813455657 6.0361032391 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.58838876751 93% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.403669724771 0.366273622748 110% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.324159021407 0.280924506359 115% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.250764525994 0.200843997647 125% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.177370030581 0.132149295362 134% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09228602873 2.79330140395 111% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 219.290929204 90% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605504587156 0.48968727796 124% => OK
Word variations: 69.675892871 55.4138127331 126% => OK
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6194690265 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.1666666667 23.380412469 78% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0336799116 59.4972553346 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.777777778 141.124799967 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1666666667 23.380412469 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.666666666667 0.674092028746 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.94800884956 141% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.21349557522 153% => OK
Readability: 50.5825688073 51.4728631049 98% => OK
Elegance: 1.38095238095 1.64882698954 84% => OK

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.326963042309 0.391690518653 83% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0641730638318 0.123202303941 52% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0518100631084 0.077325440228 67% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.577666991934 0.547984918172 105% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.193791951718 0.149214159877 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102380701643 0.161403998019 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0865066027744 0.0892212321368 97% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.177271266941 0.385218514788 46% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.037592465937 0.0692045440612 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17209779334 0.275328986314 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0670186942453 0.0653680567796 103% => OK

Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.4325221239 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.30420353982 57% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88274336283 123% => OK
Positive topic words: 7.0 7.22455752212 97% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.66592920354 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 2.70907079646 148% => OK
Total topic words: 13.0 13.5995575221 96% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.