The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them, not by their contemporaries.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
We know a myriad of great personalities, born on earth, who are rewarded with recognition and distinction. The time when they were rewarded, before or after their dismal, is contentious as this highly depends on when the impact of their work was seen. Therefore, I disagree with the given claim that the greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them, not by their contemporaries. This is a very strong statement and is not true in all the cases.
First of all, when a great area of audience is impacted by the work of a person, that person’s greatness is uncovered in front of the world. Thus, as said in the introduction, timing of this event is greatly contingent upon what contribution is the individual making and who are the audience of this, present or future generation. For example, in the domain of acting, Indian actors like Amitabh Bachan, Shahrukh Khan, etc have received prodigious number of awards for their veteran acting skill. Same is the case of sport, boxer like Mary Kom, cricketer like Sachin Tendulkar have been recognised for their amazing sports skill by their contemporaries and will be remembered by the future generations too.
On the similar line, let us wander on the path of technology, where many great figures like Elon musk, Bill gates have created history with their work while they are alive and are immensely applauded by their peers. Every one is aware of their adeptness.
However, if we take example of freedom fighters like Bhaghat Singh, Maulana Azaad, we see that their contribution was discerned after their dismal. Once, people got independence, they realized the struggle these fighters went through in order to make the impossible happen. Apart for the timing of impact, it also depends on area of audience impacted by the person’s contribution. For an instance, mothers- an epitome of sacrifice and greatness- most of the time, don’t get the amount of respect they deserve. On the other hand, because Mother Teresa contributed to broader horizon of people, her work was recognized with respect. A person, no matter how talented/ magnanimous he is, due to lack of propaganda, their work remains disguised.
In summary, an individual’s contribution is recognised when people see the impact they have made and is not dependent on generation. Once, people see the impact, either directly or through propaganda, they cherish the great work of the individual.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-08 | stevewang1007 | 58 | view |
| 2019-11-25 | cnegus | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-21 | IFE360TOXIC | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-09 | Raian Islam | 50 | view |
| 2019-10-09 | Zhang Ergou | 70 | view |
- Two years ago, radio station WCQP in Rockville decided to increase the number of call-in advice programs that it broadcast; since that time, its share of the radio audience in the Rockville listening area has increased significantly. Given WCQP's recent s 42
- Reading is more educational than watching television or movies. 70
- Summarize the points made in the lecture you just heard, explaining how they cast doubt on points made in the reading. 75
- When schools do not have enough funding or teachers, some people think physical education classes should be cut, while others believe that courses in art and music should be eliminated first. Which do you think is preferable, and why? 73
- When schools do not have enough funding or teachers, some people think physical education classes should be cut, while others believe that courses in art and music should be eliminated first. Which do you think is preferable, and why? 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, in summary, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 12.4196629213 16% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 58.6224719101 104% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2057.0 2235.4752809 92% => OK
No of words: 404.0 442.535393258 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09158415842 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48327461151 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88213531945 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 215.323595506 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569306930693 0.4932671777 115% => OK
syllable_count: 639.9 704.065955056 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.2001157406 60.3974514979 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.277777778 118.986275619 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4444444444 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.38888888889 5.21951772744 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174758454623 0.243740707755 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0605066724057 0.0831039109588 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0880259917708 0.0758088955206 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104745381848 0.150359130593 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0838720474401 0.0667264976115 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 100.480337079 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.