The human mind will always be superior to machines because machines are only tools of human minds.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The author claims that the human mind will always be superior to machines because machines are only tools of human minds. Indisputably, Machines are superior to human minds in some particular fields like science and mathematics as due to their fast problem solving ability. Nevertheless, human minds are responsible for the maintenance they need at an intermittent level. Thus, I would argue that human mind will always be superior to machines because machines are only tools of human minds.
First of all, its human mind who develops these machines according to their needs and vice-versa is impossible till date. I would like to point out that the machines are just tools in order to solve byzantine and convoluted problems, which are time taking for human minds to solve on mundane basis. To illustrate, let us look at the example of Alan Turing, computer scientist and mathematician, who developed a machine to interpret German Enigma code. He developed this machine to decipher german’s convoluted codes, humans are not able to interpret these code preciously at that time.
Consequently, It is pretty obvious that human minds will be superior to machines because machines are only tools of human minds.
Another compelling argument to speaker’s claim is that machines can’t repair themselves. However, it’s true that machines works on instructions and they repair themselves but if their instructions file would be corrupted due to fail diagnoitsic. So, its human mind who can preciously check the reason of machine failure and will do proper diagnostic by providing proper instructions. For example, if you are surfing on google and if you want to change something in ur search query the its you who can change preciously , according to your mind, not your machine who change. Furthermore, I would to like to take an example of booming sector of technology, Artificial Intelligence, its a technology in which machines learn themselves by observing their surrounding world, feelings of human. Nonetheless, AI is dangerous in learning human feelings as they changes according to person to person and situation to situation. So, machines are just tool of human minds in order to perform computation problems
Admittedly, machines are superior in some particular fields like computation, science and mathematics. This is true especially when it comes to solving convoluted problems and mathematics riddle, to launch satellites, in automotive industry works. However, the above argument does not constitute a sufficient support to claim that machines are superior to human minds.
In conclusion, although machines are far better in fields of computaion, science and mathematics but at the end all machines need intermittent level of maintenance and this is only done by human minds very acurately. So,
- Company management should conduct routine monitoring of all employee e-mail correspondence. Such monitoring will reduce the waste of resources such as time and system capacity, as well as protect the company from lawsuits. 50
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position 50
- Some people believe that teaching morality should be the foundation of education. Others believe that teaching a foundation of logical reasoning would do more to produce a moral society. 50
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company."According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than in any 66
- Claim: Even though young people often receive the advice to “follow your dreams,” more emphasis should be placed on picking worthy goals. Reason: Many people’s dreams are inherently selfish. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 497, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'its'?
Suggestion: the; its
... to change something in ur search query the its you who can change preciously , accordi...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 534, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ry the its you who can change preciously , according to your mind, not your machin...
^^
Line 6, column 696, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...of technology, Artificial Intelligence, its a technology in which machines learn th...
^^^
Line 6, column 869, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'change'
Suggestion: change
...rous in learning human feelings as they changes according to person to person and situa...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 887, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'to person'.
Suggestion: to person
...uman feelings as they changes according to person to person and situation to situation. So, machine...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 176, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...comes to solving convoluted problems and mathematics riddle, to launch satellites...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, look, nevertheless, nonetheless, so, thus, for example, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 33.0505617978 118% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 58.6224719101 113% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2391.0 2235.4752809 107% => OK
No of words: 445.0 442.535393258 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37303370787 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59293186426 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99594278124 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 215.323595506 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.465168539326 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 747.0 704.065955056 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.3407239085 60.3974514979 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 125.842105263 118.986275619 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4210526316 23.4991977007 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.10526315789 5.21951772744 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.437154075437 0.243740707755 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.159491505016 0.0831039109588 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.127675782238 0.0758088955206 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.256611665387 0.150359130593 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.122063729713 0.0667264976115 183% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 14.1392134831 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 48.8420337079 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.1639044944 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 100.480337079 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.