Company management should conduct routine monitoring of all employee e-mail correspondence. Such monitoring will reduce the waste of resources such as time and system capacity, as well as protect the company from lawsuits.
The statement above states that management group of companies should keep an eye on all employee e-mail correspondence.
I agree with the above statement and completely take into the account.
It is true that many companies which come under 500 Fortune for instance company Satyam which disintegrated, faced lawsuits due to mishappenings going above all employees. No one in the company knew about the malfeasance taking place in and around companies. To protect the company from lawsuits is one of the reasons for routine monitoring all employee e-mail correspondence. Other than this, any employee can be a traitor to the company without even knowing. It is not true for employees that everyone can walk their talk.
It is imperative to monitor e-mail of all employees as it checks the wasted time, energy on wrongdoings, unwanted wastage of resources. The resources can be utilised for the betterment of the company. An employee under the eye of management can improve exponentially as there will a fear of being monitored. A fear in the heart of doing wrong can make it right. The wrongdoings can be corrected with the help of catching the maladroit employee with limited resources. Nowadays, monitoring emails of employees of the company should become a corporate law to mitigate the number of lawsuits taking place.
Management group should also monitor employee emails because it will keep them abreast of all the appointments. The database of the company is the heart of the company. The database should be kept updated. System capacity plays an important role in monitoring emails of all employees as it will dump all the dispensable files in junk and keep the important ones in the database. In today's scenario, the employee does not take the company's vision and mission seriously. An employee comes to the company to laggard as well as waste time.
Contrary to above statements, monitoring of emails can be a bane to the company as well. Let us talk about it by taking an example, consider a staunch employee in X company. We can say he is loyal by his previous records and honesty to company benefits. Now if X employee shares a classifies information with his senior employee on which they are working then by monitoring all emails of the employee, X can be caught and all the classifies information can be leaked which should be happened before time.
I want to conclude by saying that monitoring all employee emails should be there in every company irrespective of time, place or anything.
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 33
- Governments should invest as much in the arts as they do in the military. 50
- SuperCorp recently moved its headquarters to Corporateville. The recent surge in the number of homeowners in Corporateville proves that Corporateville is a superior place to live than Middlesburg, the home of SuperCorp's current headquarters. Moreover, Mi 50
- The following is a letter from the parent of a private school student to the principal of that school:Last year, Kensington Academy turned over management of its cafeteria to a private vendor, Swift Nutrition. This company serves low-fat, low-calorie meal 50
- Every individual in a society has a responsibility to obey just laws and to disobey and resist unjust laws.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure 58
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, then, well, for instance, as well as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 58.6224719101 107% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2101.0 2235.4752809 94% => OK
No of words: 420.0 442.535393258 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00238095238 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52701905584 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85438259524 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 215.323595506 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.461904761905 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 654.3 704.065955056 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.348599853 60.3974514979 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.5416666667 118.986275619 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5 23.4991977007 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.58333333333 5.21951772744 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.97078651685 141% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.368490982202 0.243740707755 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121061758624 0.0831039109588 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0955876663323 0.0758088955206 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201618907512 0.150359130593 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0931678805721 0.0667264976115 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 14.1392134831 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.42 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 100.480337079 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.