The human mind will always be superior to machines because machines are only tools of human minds.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
I disagree with the statement that machines are inferior to human minds because they are only tools of the human mind. While this may be true, history and current day events of technological advancement has shown the immense power that machines have over the human intellect, despite being created by humans. Therefore, the advancement of machines since the industrial revolution to modern day use of computers and smartphones have been apt to show its power over humans.
The historical evolution of machines have shown its power over the human brain. While machines have been created by the human minds in order to progress in societal matters, they have precariously harmed humans. Take the industrial revolution, for instance, when the vast development of factories and complex machines were created to produce textiles, manufacture clothes, and pack meats. While the machines were made and controlled by humans for matters of production and merchandise, they have been able to overpower humans when safety around these machines has not been emphasized. Women who produced textiles and were not careful with the machines have cut arms and bruised their skin. Additionally, children who unlawfully worked in factories surrounded by these complex machines have died for lack of safety and provisions over their worksite. Therefore, machines have the ability to overpower and harm humans. While it may be true that we have progressed from this period and improved in safety measures, there is no doubt how dangerous and powerful machines can be. Hence, when producing machines, one must be prudential in its development and understand the impact on humans when safety is considered, since there is a high chance of risk.
Additionally, the vast development of technology has shown how machines have been superior to the human brain. For instance, computers and tablets have shown to hold an prodigious and endless amount of files and data that no human brain is capable of storing. With this in mind, humans have looked towards the use of computers and tablets to help store and research information on applications, such as Google and Bing. In addition to computers, the usage of smartphones have shown superiority over human intelligence. Phones have been used for a variety of purposes, such as being able to detect one’s blood pressure and being able to set an alarm to wake up and start your day. These purposes cannot be done by humans alone who rely on these devices to get through their days. While humans have proven that they are capable of storing an immense amount of information by studying and by being able to take their own blood pressure and wake up by their own biological clock, the machines have proven to reinforce the lives of humans by moderating their challenges. Therefore, machines are superior when humans rely on them for multipurpose uses.
For the aforementioned reasons, it is not to say that humans lack intelligence. Really, machines have been able to be superior in situations where humans have no control over. As shown with the industrial revolution, machines have altered the livelihoods of humans by altering the workforce industry. By doing that, it has placed unsafe measures, in which humans were not aware of at the time. Slowly and surely humans have improved, however, it is still possible for machines to cause harm. Additionally, the technology industry has shown how machines have altered and impacted the lives of humans, making life demands much easier. However, computers and smartphones have been able to take over the way information is stored and how one goes about their day. The reliance of technology has led to the superiority and need of machines.
Therefore, I disagree that machines are inferior. Although created by humans, machines have been able to overpower and alter the livelihoods of humans, who continuously demand their needs.
- The following appeared in a memo from a vice president of Quiot Manufacturing During the past year Quiot Manufacturing had 30 percent more on the job accidents than at the nearby Panoply Industries plant where the work shifts are one hour shorter than our 75
- The following appeared in a letter to the editor of the Balmer Island Gazette On Balmer Island where mopeds serve as a popular form of transportation the population increases to 100 000 during the summer months To reduce the number of accidents involving 73
- A recent study reported that pet owners have longer healthier lives on average than do people who own no pets Specifically dog owners tend to have a lower incidence of heart disease In light of these findings Sherwood Hospital should form a partnership wi 50
- The luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life prevent people from developing into truly strong and independent individuals Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning f 60
- People s behavior is largely determined by forces not of their own making Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure to address the most compelling reas 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 167, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...omputers and tablets have shown to hold an prodigious and endless amount of files ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, look, may, really, so, still, therefore, while, for instance, in addition, in fact, no doubt, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 35.0 19.5258426966 179% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 29.0 14.8657303371 195% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.3162921348 168% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 33.0505617978 118% => OK
Preposition: 92.0 58.6224719101 157% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3272.0 2235.4752809 146% => OK
No of words: 635.0 442.535393258 143% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15275590551 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.01988110783 4.55969084622 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74065974218 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 263.0 215.323595506 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.414173228346 0.4932671777 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1052.1 704.065955056 149% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 10.0 3.10617977528 322% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 30.0 20.2370786517 148% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1006467963 60.3974514979 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.066666667 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1666666667 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.03333333333 5.21951772744 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 10.2758426966 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246146552093 0.243740707755 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0935193269317 0.0831039109588 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0710218397199 0.0758088955206 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170231082287 0.150359130593 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0511503105144 0.0667264976115 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 14.1392134831 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.8420337079 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 132.0 100.480337079 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.