If a goal is worthy then any means taken to attain it are justifiable Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting your

Essay topics:

If a goal is worthy, then any means taken to attain it are justifiable. Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.

The speaker asserts that as long as goal is worthy, any means taken to attain it are justifiable. Indeed, stopping at nothing to get anything can help us fulfill some purposes. However, if any means taken to attain goal are extreme, it has negative influence on society and individuals. There are three kinds of fields, including economic, political, and entertainment fields, can reflect the negative effect. In my point of view, I strongly disagree with the speaker.

To begin with, in the economic fields, any means taken to attain goal will cause economic recession. It is common that companies want to earn more profit, but if they do not stop at nothing to get what they want, they will cause social conflicts and economic disorder. Unfair competition can be an example. Since unfair competition cause economic injury to a business through deceptive or wrong business practices, it will lead to economic disorder. In sum, stopping at nothing to get anything will harm the economy.

Secondly, in the political area, stopping at nothing to get anything will induce political disorder. To many politicians, becoming a president is their final goal. However, when they stop at nothing to get what they want in order to be a president, they cause social disorder. Africa conflict is an example. For own interest, Africa’s leaders star many wars in Africa without minding victims. In a word, in the political area, if leaders stop at nothing to get what they want, it will lead to social disorder.

Finally, in the entertainment fields, any means taken to attain goal will result unfair competition. To actors, wanting to be famous is reasonable, while if they stop at nothing to obtain what they want, it may cause improper things to happen. Unspoken rules in Korea can be an illustration. In Korea, because many actresses want to be famous, they stop at nothing to receive what they want; And in order to get opportunity of plays, they slept with director. As a result, many actresses commit a suicide, since such insult are unbearable. In brief, if people stop at nothing to get what they want, it is necessary to happen some improper things, even impairing themselves.

To sum up, in economic, political, and entertainment fields, any means taken to attain goal will cause a negative effect on society and individuals. Therefore, I totally disagree with what the speaker says.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-11-28 nha1806 view
2024-11-25 ekarumeblessing@icloud.com 54 view
2024-11-18 ekarumeblessing@icloud.com 66 view
2024-11-10 hhj 66 view
2024-11-09 KLH 66 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user Andy_84 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 82, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'is'?
Suggestion: is
...is worthy, any means taken to attain it are justifiable. Indeed, stopping at nothin...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, in brief, as a result, to begin with, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.3162921348 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 58.6224719101 111% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1998.0 2235.4752809 89% => OK
No of words: 399.0 442.535393258 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00751879699 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46933824581 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72021859389 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 215.323595506 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.4335839599 0.4932671777 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 621.9 704.065955056 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.10617977528 290% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 16.0 4.38483146067 365% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.622437887 60.3974514979 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.25 118.986275619 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.625 23.4991977007 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.95833333333 5.21951772744 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 18.0 5.13820224719 350% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0811892613633 0.243740707755 33% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0365992692128 0.0831039109588 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0545105256979 0.0758088955206 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0711693263212 0.150359130593 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.049093098514 0.0667264976115 74% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 14.1392134831 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 48.8420337079 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 100.480337079 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.