If two applicants for a job are otherwise equally qualified, the job should go to the applicant with more experience.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the specific circumstances in which adopting the position would or would not be advantageous and explain how there examples shape your position.
During the hiring processes, human recources departments look for the best candidate for each position. “The best candidate” is selected in the light of crucial factors such as experience, education, references, personal accomplishments and the ultimate choice is made considering each of these factors. If each aspect of both candidates, apart from experience, is tantamount; I think the one to be hired differs according to the demands of the position.
For example, executive positions require skills such as critical tinking, problem solving, decision making under stressful environments, etc. However, mid-tier positions such as specialists are the best for ambitious, compassionate, enthusiastic people who are ready for competition. In this case, I believe, companies might go for the experiences candidate if they think that the position requires it. Furthermore, they should pick the -possibly- younger and more enthusiastic person if they need fresh-blood in the work place.
However, one more thing to consider while recruiting the inexperienced is, the countanence between time and money. Also, the time factor should be considered for the team which is going to be enhanced. What I mean is, if the company is lacking the experienced work force to help the tyros, they surely cannot employ inexperienced people, no matter what the position requires. Moreover, many commercial companies tend to go for the experienced candidate, even though the position does not necessarily need higher level of experience. In most cases this is because they prefer not spend any time with the apprentice and waste the time of the already experienced employee to teach him or her.
The solution to this paradox, is found in summer camps. Many companies like Google, Apple, Amazon, Vodafone and -in Turkey- Vestel, Doğuş Broadcasting, etc. establish “Summer Camps for the Leaders of the Future”. As I mentioned above, especially the executive positions demand experience. However, many companies hire young and inexperienced but enthusiastic people for these positions, with especially monetary apprehensions. During these camps, though they do not provide any stipend for the attainment, the companies select the best participants and offer them germane positions in the company. The vital benefit of these camps is, since the tyros are hired the person after the training for which the companies paid absolutely nothing, they do not spend almost any time or money for the adjustment process of an inperienced employee.
Even though summer camps seem a bit unfair, since we are talking about tens of people attending a program without earning nothing but little experience, I believe they are an opportunity for the inexperienced people to be hired for higher positions. A company who cannot afford a highly experienced candidate, might be a chance for a young new-graduate looking for a stepping stone. Furthermore, these camps are carrying the role of a mediator in between. They provide the training process which is needed by both the candidate and the company.
As a result, I think that each and every position requires different levels of experience. As I mentioned before, in expecially higher positions, people seriously need to manage their stress level and this is acquired through time. However, for some positions, being eager and willing is more important. That is why I go in between and say, the job should not always go to the experienced applicant.
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position 66
- GRE Argument: An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, far 69
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. 33
- The Workforce Challenge 89
- If two applicants for a job are otherwise equally qualified, the job should go to the applicant with more experience. Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the pos 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 337, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'experiences'' or 'experience's'?
Suggestion: experiences'; experience's
..., I believe, companies might go for the experiences candidate if they think that the positi...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, look, moreover, so, thus, while, apart from, for example, i mean, i think, such as, talking about, as a result, in most cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2956.0 2235.4752809 132% => OK
No of words: 545.0 442.535393258 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42385321101 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.83169070408 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03038174727 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 271.0 215.323595506 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497247706422 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 918.0 704.065955056 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 10.0 3.10617977528 322% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.2370786517 133% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.4178732877 60.3974514979 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.481481481 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1851851852 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.21951772744 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.83258426966 207% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167141341731 0.243740707755 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0503251764825 0.0831039109588 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0388211558941 0.0758088955206 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0960506146212 0.150359130593 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0173509120378 0.0667264976115 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 48.8420337079 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.1639044944 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 142.0 100.480337079 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.