If two applicants for a job are otherwise equally qualified, the job should go to the applicant with more experience.
Stating that if two applicants for a job are otherwise equally qualified, the job should go to the applicant with more experience, this view asserts that more experienced people have the bigger possibility that he can give more benefit to an organization. In some senses, it seems true that the one who is familiar with any tasks may adapt to the organization more faster than the people who are not and this tendency will make difference in result. In my point, however, considering that some views, it could be not beneficial for a company to hire experienced men.
Of course, few would disagree that experience is very important thing. In terms of expense which can occur from teaching unexperienced people, it is desirable to advise for personal department to give opportunity experienced people For example, in reality, many companies mainly see whether an applicant have had realted job experience and prefer people who have had internship in the company.
this shows that by hiring well-trained people, an organization can save expense and this can lead direct profit of the incorporation.
however, can we always say that experience are helpful? my answer is definitely no. considering many great inventors or CEOs, who gave vigor to calcified organizations, new-comer may make great opportunities. For example, Bil Gates and Steve jobs are not experienced CEOs and when they established their own companies, they were only 20s years-old and even did not have related major such as computer engineering or design. however, they are estimated as the greatest CEOs. The bottom line is that experience may always important.
Moreover, considering that people who are called as genius or prodigy, the length of times when ordinary people use their in a filed may be not the absolute criterion that is used when assessing an individual. For example, there are many professional sports players who have worked for many years. however, high-talented players such as Killian Maple or Osman Kemble are better than most of them. this shows that we can not score an individual with only one trait.
to summarize, it is true. however, when it comes to that newbies can make great innovations in an organization and people cannot be assessed in only one perspective, it is undesirable. Only ignoring this importance, the personnel department will give chance to experienced people
- The following appeared as an editorial in the student newspaper of Groveton College."To combat the recently reported dramatic rise in cheating among college students, colleges and universities should adopt honor codes similar to Groveton's, whic 55
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speakers or reformer ever could 50
- The best way to understand the character of a society is to examine the character of the men and women that the society chooses as its heroes or its role models. 62
- Claim: Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's major field of study. Reason: Acquiring knowledge of various academic disciplines is the best way to become truly educated. 66
- The following appeared in a recommendation from the planning department of the city of Transopolis."Ten years ago, as part of a comprehensive urban renewal program, the city of Transopolis adapted for industrial use a large area of severely substanda 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 361, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'faster' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: faster
...any tasks may adapt to the organization more faster than the people who are not and this te...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 232, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t to give opportunity experienced people For example, in reality, many companies ...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...ho have had internship in the company. this shows that by hiring well-trained peopl...
^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...ect profit of the incorporation. however, can we always say that experience are ...
^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 57, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: My
...always say that experience are helpful? my answer is definitely no. considering ma...
^^
Line 8, column 426, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...uch as computer engineering or design. however, they are estimated as the greatest CEO...
^^^^^^^
Line 12, column 299, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...players who have worked for many years. however, high-talented players such as Killian ...
^^^^^^^
Line 12, column 398, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...an Kemble are better than most of them. this shows that we can not score an individu...
^^^^
Line 15, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: To
...n individual with only one trait. to summarize, it is true. however, when it...
^^
Line 15, column 27, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
... trait. to summarize, it is true. however, when it comes to that newbies can make...
^^^^^^^
Line 15, column 280, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t will give chance to experienced people
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, moreover, so, well, for example, of course, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 24.0 11.3162921348 212% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 58.6224719101 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2012.0 2235.4752809 90% => OK
No of words: 387.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19896640827 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92401438401 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 215.323595506 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.524547803618 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 641.7 704.065955056 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 78.4315381262 60.3974514979 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.777777778 118.986275619 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.21951772744 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 7.80617977528 141% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218800081655 0.243740707755 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0560697612958 0.0831039109588 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.143758611612 0.0758088955206 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104687777017 0.150359130593 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.150992708954 0.0667264976115 226% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.8420337079 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 100.480337079 95% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.8971910112 160% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.