If two applicants for a job are otherwise equally qualified, the job should go to the applicant with more experience.
Experience teaches a lot, you learn ways of going about your work activities stacked with previous on-the-job knowledge, which in turn leads to a reduced amount of errors and a greater efficiency. However, this does not tell the full story when one considers other areas in which having more job experience doesn’t translate to getting the job done effectively.
As with most young graduates, a lot of whom lack work experience, if companies adhere strictly to this topic, it will be extremely difficult for any of them getting jobs. How do you get work experience when company refuse to hire you solely based on this? Companies that hire solely based on this sentiment are potentially losing out on the new and innovative ideas young graduates which their older counterparts may not possess. For example, in hiring a content producer for an advertising company, while it is helpful to have useful job experience, it is the imagination and creativity that matters the most in such a role. Therefore, companies should seek to hire based on what the job requires rather than deciding solely on work experience, since being qualified for a job, does not prove your success on the job.
Furthermore, with the increasing amount of graduates every year and the reduced amount of jobs available, It is highly unadvisable to stick to the trend of disqualifying a qualified candidate for a job based on their work experience. There are certain jobs that require physical strength and resilience in order to carry out their jobs effectively, hiring based on work experience alone may be counter-intuitive.
However, there are situations at which hiring based on work experience is the best approach. For example, when looking out for a Human resource manager, in a job like this, the most important requirement for this job is knowing how to manage a company’s resources appropriately. This knowledge comes with years of on-the-job knowledge. Hiring a manager with little to no previous experience in this field might prove to be counterproductive and in turn lead to general worker apathy. Nevertheless, if a young candidate with no experience has proof that they have the necessary knowledge and skills to carry out the job effectively, the candidate may have gone through several trainings and certifications in project management, armed with this knowledge, such a candidate should not be disqualified based on their lack of experience.
In sum, the major decision for hiring for a candidate for a job should be based on a case by case requirement. Hiring based on one criterion over the other may prove to be vital in some areas, while it may prove to only be an added not-so-important advantage.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-04 | sunnyojh | 62 | view |
| 2023-01-28 | Pranav Pipada | 83 | view |
| 2022-10-15 | Tanub922 | 79 | view |
| 2022-07-20 | Thelmacakes | 50 | view |
| 2022-06-01 | jdkarmakar2021@gmail.com | 83 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 218, Rule ID: NON_ACTION_CONTINUOUS[3]
Message: The verb know is usually not used with a continuous form, use the simple form instead. Suggestion: 'knows'
Suggestion: knows
...most important requirement for this job is knowing how to manage a company’s resources app...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 218, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...most important requirement for this job is knowing how to manage a company’s resources app...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, look, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 58.6224719101 116% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2265.0 2235.4752809 101% => OK
No of words: 446.0 442.535393258 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07847533632 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5955099915 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03249442566 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 215.323595506 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.479820627803 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 719.1 704.065955056 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.7366906681 60.3974514979 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.5625 118.986275619 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.875 23.4991977007 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.21951772744 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276169727686 0.243740707755 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112668440653 0.0831039109588 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0710476059507 0.0758088955206 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182581277135 0.150359130593 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0419106438801 0.0667264976115 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 14.1392134831 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 100.480337079 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.