“An increased number of laws or rules, ironically leads to a diminished sense of morality and impoverished relations
among people.”
The speaker's claim that a rise in number of laws would lead to a fall in morality and distance the relationship among people is justifiable. An increase in crime has lead to the establishment of many rules. But this has not served to instill a greater sense of morality in people or maintain the relationship among people. Hence, I completely agree with the speaker.
Firstly, let us consider the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia which is well known for the strict and numerous rules it imposes. The country restricts the citizens on a personal and social level. The country bans socializing between sexes and only allows for family gatherings in public places. This inhibits healthy relationships between genders and can bring forth lewd behaviours. The country also places females as inferior before law which is taken advantage of by many. Thus an increase in the laws does not guarantee its citizens to follow moral values.
Secondly, even though numerous laws against piracy have been put forward on a global scale, the problem is still existant and on the rise. Online piracy is so common nowadays, that it is no more considered to be illicit. It is human nature to oppose rather than comply. The increased number of laws has only provided incentive for criminal minds to break them. Let us also consider a university which is strict in its rules. This cultivates a rebellious nature in students and leads them down the path of self-destruction. This will also lead to wrongful influence on other people and lead to noxious relations. However, if the rules were lenient, it allows for the students to develop the sense of right and wrong on their own. This distinction of right on wrong which is not forced, will assist them in their future life.
Thirdly, the glut of laws that exists within the society will inculcate a fear of the law within some people. A recent incident in India, where bystanders refused to aid the victims of accident case is proof for the fear of law. The numerous rules and procedures that comes along with an accident case hinders people from lending a helping hand in a near-death situation. This increase of laws has motivated inhumane actions. Additionally, rules of privacy has now been strengthened to the extent that a husband can sue his wife for infringement of privacy. Such unreasonable laws hamper growth of relationships.
To sum up, rules are made to maintain peace in the society. However, an abundance of laws can suffocate the citizens and encourage them to breach the law or instill an aversion to law. This leads to immoral behaviour and diminishes healthy relations among people.
- The following appeared in an internal memo circulated amongst the partners of a small design firm:“We, the four partners of Max Design, have made the company what it is. When we are hired by a client, it is our taste andstyle that the client is paying f 70
- The following was a memorandum by the campaign manger for a state senate candidate:“Contributers to nearly every major blog in the state, both democratic and republican, agree that a proposal to increasetolls on the major highways going through our stat 83
- The following appeared on the op-ed page of a local newspaper:“As violent crime rates have slowly inched up in our city, it is time for city officials to take a stand to protect citizens fromharm. The first step is to gate and lock downtown parks after 70
- “An increased number of laws or rules, ironically leads to a diminished sense of morality and impoverished relationsamong people.” 62
- The following appeared in a memorandum from the regional manager of the Taste of Italy restaurant chain:“After the first month of service, the new restaurant in the Flatplains Mall, which uses the Chipless brand of wine glasses,has reported a far lower 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 467, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...aw which is taken advantage of by many. Thus an increase in the laws does not guaran...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'firstly', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'still', 'then', 'third', 'thirdly', 'thus', 'well', 'to sum up']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.246913580247 0.240241500013 103% => OK
Verbs: 0.168724279835 0.157235817809 107% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0781893004115 0.0880659088768 89% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0493827160494 0.0497285424764 99% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0329218106996 0.0444667217837 74% => OK
Prepositions: 0.127572016461 0.12292977631 104% => OK
Participles: 0.0349794238683 0.0406280797675 86% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.69045547966 2.79330140395 96% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0349794238683 0.030933414821 113% => OK
Particles: 0.00411522633745 0.0016655270985 247% => OK
Determiners: 0.11316872428 0.0997080785238 114% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0144032921811 0.0249443105267 58% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0144032921811 0.0148568991511 97% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2636.0 2732.02544248 96% => OK
No of words: 445.0 452.878318584 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.92359550562 6.0361032391 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59293186426 4.58838876751 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.361797752809 0.366273622748 99% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.262921348315 0.280924506359 94% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.186516853933 0.200843997647 93% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0921348314607 0.132149295362 70% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69045547966 2.79330140395 96% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 219.290929204 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52808988764 0.48968727796 108% => OK
Word variations: 61.2398905842 55.4138127331 111% => OK
How many sentences: 28.0 20.6194690265 136% => OK
Sentence length: 15.8928571429 23.380412469 68% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.8124654146 59.4972553346 48% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.1428571429 141.124799967 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8928571429 23.380412469 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.607142857143 0.674092028746 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.21349557522 19% => OK
Readability: 42.1849919743 51.4728631049 82% => OK
Elegance: 1.63114754098 1.64882698954 99% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27709006684 0.391690518653 71% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0801375087541 0.123202303941 65% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0652805775782 0.077325440228 84% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.461807048507 0.547984918172 84% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.139267490849 0.149214159877 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101622720244 0.161403998019 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0613016734509 0.0892212321368 69% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.356764680982 0.385218514788 93% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0363803064564 0.0692045440612 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206772641247 0.275328986314 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0533799022582 0.0653680567796 82% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.4325221239 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 5.30420353982 226% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88274336283 82% => OK
Positive topic words: 8.0 7.22455752212 111% => OK
Negative topic words: 7.0 3.66592920354 191% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 2.70907079646 148% => OK
Total topic words: 19.0 13.5995575221 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.