It is easy to see the division between college courses of interest and courses that lead to jobs. Depending on your perspective, finding a job post graduation outweighs elective interests and should take precedence. However, this issue is based on the assumption that enjoyment in a course cannot overlap with pragmatism. In many situations, college students can pursue courses that they find both useful and interesting.
The statement reflects the idea that anything a college student finds enjoyable will not lead to employment. While this may be true in some outlying cases, it is a bold assumption. Students should be encouraged to find both something they enjoy and something that leads to financial stability. For instance, when finding happiness in cooking, students should be encouraged to pursue courses in the culinary arts. Mixing passion with education will only bolster success. There is no logical reason to assume that pursuing an education in something you love will result in unemployment.
Building on this idea is that success is determined by the ability and ease of employment. It can be alternatively argued that happiness is more important than financial or economical advantage. Throughout college studies, for example, a student may form a passion for 18th century French oil paintings. Job opportunities may be limited in this field. However, if the student is indeed fulfilled and passionate about coursework and career selection should he or she be discouraged? Admittedly, there are exponentially more fiscally sound opportunities found in other subject matters, such as medicine or accounting. Yet, one may be more satisfied making half as much when engaging in something they find enjoyable. Afterall, there exists the idea that if you love and find happiness in what you do you never suffer a day of work in your life.
Conclusively, we often hold more merit on careers and college courses that lead to employment when compared to the things we find enjoyable. It can be argued that it is possible to pursue coursework that both pragmatic and positively engaging. Furthermore, success should not necessarily be solely gauged on the ability to find employment and should not be over-stressed when considering ones overall satisfaction and emotional well being.
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 58
- In order to reverse the recent decline in our profits, we must reduce operating expenses at Movies Galore’s ten video rental stores. Since we are famous for our special bargains, raising our rental prices is not a viable way to improve profits. Last mon 16
- Some people believe that in order to thrive, a society must put its own overall success before the well-being of its individual citizens. Others believe that the well-being of a society can only be measured by the general welfare of all its people. 50
- Issue Type - College students should be encouraged to pursue subjects that interest them rather than the courses that seem most likely to lead to jobs. 50
- Argument Topic :“In order to reverse the recent decline in our profits, we must reduce operating expenses at Movies Galore’s ten video rental stores. Since we are famous for our special bargains, raising our rental prices is not a viable way to improv 16
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 467, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
...k and career selection should he or she be discouraged? Admittedly, there are expo...
^^
Line 5, column 716, Rule ID: AFTERALL[1]
Message: Did you mean 'after all'?
Suggestion: After all
...aging in something they find enjoyable. Afterall, there exists the idea that if you love...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, may, so, well, while, for example, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 58.6224719101 67% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1940.0 2235.4752809 87% => OK
No of words: 364.0 442.535393258 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32967032967 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9867527426 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 215.323595506 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532967032967 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 599.4 704.065955056 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.8750990283 60.3974514979 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 92.380952381 118.986275619 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3333333333 23.4991977007 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.90476190476 5.21951772744 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 21.0 10.2758426966 204% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287133590266 0.243740707755 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0843520023364 0.0831039109588 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0696603978818 0.0758088955206 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185369766467 0.150359130593 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0596885082197 0.0667264976115 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.1392134831 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 100.480337079 95% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.