It is dangerous to trust only intelligence.
Intelligence is one of the prominent tools to achieve success in life and we the help of it only we have surpassed other living beings. We have over come many difficult problems like the progress in medical and scientific field. In this cruel world where there are limited opportunities and abundant people, it becomes crucial to use it and find a niche for our self. No one remembers a dull person and make it difficult for them to find a place.
To begin with, with the help of intelligence we have left behind many problems which seemed impossible to overcome. For instance, we have built technology with help of it and we control things which are far away from us and we have eradicated many diseases that have decimated millions of people.
Secondly, as it said that empty mind is devil’s workshop it is important to always work on productive things. Moreover, keep our brain healthy and free from all negative vibes, which try to make us selfish and greedy for power so that we forget about others and we forget the feelings like compassion, love and generosity. Which could be baleful for others. For example, humans all feel that they are superior race and we forget that all species have equal rights on mother nature. We have destroyed many forests which home for millions of animals and started polluting water bodies with chemicals, plastics.
Lastly, if we only depend on intelligence and stop listening to our heart. Then we become so selfish and we ignore our emotions, become pragmatic. Which could be very harmful for us. Since, humans are social friendly organism, we believe in helping others and growing along with them.
To sum up, it is very much important to keep our brain active and investment in a productive way, redacting all negative thoughts like avarice and selfish. We should maintain balance by having commensurate amount of emotions and intelligence. Since, we are social beings and give equal importance to all other animals.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-08-08 | ishraqtashdid | 75 | view |
2020-08-08 | ishraqtashdid | 58 | view |
2020-08-08 | ishraqtashdid | 58 | view |
2020-08-08 | ishraqtashdid | 58 | view |
2019-07-18 | liakath96 | 16 | view |
- It is always an individual who is the impetus for innovation; the details may be worked out by a team, but true innovation results from the enterprise and unique perception of an individual. 50
- Laws should not be rigid or fixed. Instead, they should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places. 50
- A recent study shows that people living on the continent of North America suffer 9 times more chronic fatigue and 31 times more chronic depression than do people living on the continent of Asia. Interestingly, Asians, on average, eat 20 grams of soy per d 78
- It is dangerous to trust only intelligence. 16
- the best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition. Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagre 16
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 78, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a productive way" with adverb for "productive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...to keep our brain active and investment in a productive way, redacting all negative thoughts like a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, lastly, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, for example, for instance, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 33.0505617978 127% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1637.0 2235.4752809 73% => OK
No of words: 335.0 442.535393258 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88656716418 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58764134407 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 215.323595506 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555223880597 0.4932671777 113% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 704.065955056 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.0801754901 60.3974514979 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.9444444444 118.986275619 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6111111111 23.4991977007 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.61111111111 5.21951772744 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0296569362846 0.243740707755 12% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0138895625858 0.0831039109588 17% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0315246918515 0.0758088955206 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0218949417391 0.150359130593 15% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0180923369559 0.0667264976115 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 14.1392134831 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.1639044944 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 100.480337079 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.