It is often necessary, even desirable, for political leaders to withhold information from the public.
Certain information is highly critical and its revelation to the public could pose risk to the national integrity and sovereignty. It is therefore, I agree with the claim that political leaders should withhold such information from the public. However, on the other hand, it is the right of people to know about each and every governmental activity and so, the information, the revelation of which do not pose any risk to the nation and its people, should be revealed for the following reasons.
Certain governmental information is highly critical and the disclosure of such information to the public could be risky and pose a great threat to the public interest. For instance, the governmental strategy to tackle with the terrorists, if gets public, will help terrorists become aware of the governmental policy and adopt some countermeasure to escape from arrest and punishments. The same terrorists after being able to escape could cause harm to the public and nation by blasting and kidnapping people or commandeering airbus. It is therefore highly crucial to keep such information clandestine within the government.
Similarly, sharing of personal information of political leaders could malign their reputation and even destroy their political career. For instance, despite having high political prowess, public disclosure of Bill Clinton sex scandal has not only defamed him but also ended his political career. Further, Richard Nixon’s Watergate scandal badly spoiled his reputation due to which he has to end his political career. The above examples illustrates why public disclosure of personal information of political leaders is disadvantageous to both the nation and to themselves.
Similarly, revelation of information which can cause chaos in the nation is equally disadvantageous. Public disclosure of such information could create a situation of wild confusion in the nation and can also leads to the destruction. For instance, the revelation of antipathy and hostility of one of the religious leader upon another religion has engendered Hindu-Muslim war in India. This war lasted for several weeks and took the lives of hundreds of innocent people with the destructions huge sum of national property. Thus, it is not beneficial to reveal all the information to the public.
Aside from abovementioned provisos, it is required for the political leader to disclose all the information to the public which do not pose any risk to the public and the nation as a whole. Revelation of political activities of the political leader would help make insightful decision on the efficacies of these leaders. Similarly, revelation of the information of the political leaders in front of the public would help to judge them and their works in favor of the nation and public interests. This would ultimately help people choose the better leader in the future for the development of the nation.
In conclusion, the question whether to disclose political information to the public depends upon the nature of the information and the gravity of the consequence the information holds. If the revelation of such information do pose some risk on the life of people and the integrity of the nation, it is better not to disclose such information. And if the revelation of information is in the favor of the nation and its people, it is always beneficial to disclose such information.
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate 75
- Two years ago consultants predicted that West Egg s landfill which is used for garbage disposal would be completely filled within five years During the past two years however the town s residents have been recycling twice as much material as they did in p 58
- Over the past year our late night news program has devoted increasingly more time to covering national news and less time to covering weather and local news During the same time period most of the complaints we received from viewers were concerned with th
- In surveys Mason City residents rank water sports swimming boating and fishing among their favorite recreational activities The Mason River flowing through the city is rarely used for these pursuits however and the city park department devotes little of i 55
- A person who knowingly commits a crime has broken the social contract and should not retain any civil rights or the right to benefit from his or her own labor Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim a 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 437, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[2]
Message: You should probably use 'illustrate'.
Suggestion: illustrate
...is political career. The above examples illustrates why public disclosure of personal infor...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 210, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'lead'
Suggestion: lead
...ld confusion in the nation and can also leads to the destruction. For instance, the r...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 16, Rule ID: WHETHER[5]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "the question"?
Suggestion: whether
...lopment of the nation. In conclusion, the question whether to disclose political information to th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, similarly, so, therefore, thus, as to, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 14.8657303371 168% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 83.0 58.6224719101 142% => OK
Nominalization: 39.0 12.9106741573 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2842.0 2235.4752809 127% => OK
No of words: 540.0 442.535393258 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26296296296 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.82057051367 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05193725159 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 215.323595506 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.405555555556 0.4932671777 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 909.0 704.065955056 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4436737975 60.3974514979 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.565217391 118.986275619 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4782608696 23.4991977007 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.73913043478 5.21951772744 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.355244475151 0.243740707755 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124441065431 0.0831039109588 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0869561690243 0.0758088955206 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204062498297 0.150359130593 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0612613196498 0.0667264976115 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 14.1392134831 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 48.8420337079 81% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.92365168539 164% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.1639044944 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 100.480337079 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 11.8971910112 134% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.7820224719 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.