Governments officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve.
The writer contends that government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve. I strongly agree with the author's contention.
First of all, there are many kinds of people in the society, some are aboveboard whereas some are deceitful. When the government officials carry out the will the people they serve without questioning, its is okay when the people are honest and straightforward, but what is the situation when the people they serve are not honest. For instance, suppose I work in a government office, suddenly a citizen came and ask to make a counterfeit document for him, if I do his task without questioning what will happen? Perhaps I will be fired if the authority took a look about the counterfeit document. One the other hand, this might not be the only case, it is a unethical task itself.
Second of all, government officials are the worker's of the government, they have to carry out any task accoriding to the government's rule and regulations, before joining the government service they had to take a oth that they will perform the task under the government's rule and regulations. In the working place, some people may tell them to carry out the task according to the government rules and regulations, however some people might order them to do those task which are out of the government rules and regulations. In such case, this reccommendation might be a grave mistake.
Third of all, in my point of view, any government officials should obey the rules of the government. Before carry out any task that the people have given to them, they need to rely on their own judgment, and they have to decide whethere it is under the law or not. If they execute the tsk in this way, the rules of law can be established within a country easily.
In conclusion, the author's assertion is absolutely correct, carrying out the will of the people they serve unquestioningly might be the great mistake. Possibly, it has huge probability to go such task out of the law. Hence, because of the consequence that might happen as described above, I strongly agree with the writer's claim.
- Communal online encyclopedias represent one of the latest resources to be found on the Internet They are in many respects like traditional printed encyclopedias collections of articles on various subjects What is specific to these online encyclopedias how 90
- Communal online encyclopedias represent one of the latest resources to be found on the Internet They are in many respects like traditional printed encyclopedias collections of articles on various subjects What is specific to these online encyclopedias how 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement At universities and colleges sports and social activities are just as important as libraries and should receive equal financial support Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Over the past year our late night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news During this time period most of the complaints received from viewers were concerned with our station s coverage of weather a 70
- The technology creates more problems than it solves and may threaten or damage the quality of life 62
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 180, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...e they serve. I strongly agree with the authors contention. First of all, there are...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 655, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... this might not be the only case, it is a unethical task itself. Second of al...
^
Line 5, column 15, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nethical task itself. Second of all, government officials are the workers of ...
^^
Line 5, column 123, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...to carry out any task accoriding to the governments rule and regulations, before joining th...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 212, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...the government service they had to take a oth that they will perform the task und...
^
Line 5, column 260, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...at they will perform the task under the governments rule and regulations. In the working pl...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 20, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
... country easily. In conclusion, the authors assertion is absolutely correct, carryi...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, if, look, may, second, so, third, whereas, for instance, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1797.0 2235.4752809 80% => OK
No of words: 373.0 442.535393258 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81769436997 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39467950092 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80419214611 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 215.323595506 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.458445040214 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 555.3 704.065955056 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.9764125924 60.3974514979 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.3125 118.986275619 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3125 23.4991977007 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.21951772744 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.486174104135 0.243740707755 199% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.150761838101 0.0831039109588 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.19954344194 0.0758088955206 263% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.31737040801 0.150359130593 211% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.171668526972 0.0667264976115 257% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.8420337079 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.49 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 100.480337079 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.