Although innovations such as computers, videos, and internet seems to offer schools improved methods for instructing students. These technologies all too often distract from real learning
Teaching is the process of imparting the knowledge, a teacher have, to the students in an effective and easy way as much possible. Innovations such as computers, videos and internets always provide schools an excellent method of instructing students with detail audio-visual mechanisms of the processes. I therefore strongly disagree with the claim that these technologies often distract from real learning for the following reasons.
Learning is effective only when the whole process of any phenomenon under study is observed properly with complete oral explanation. A marker, a white and a book is not sufficient to provide detail knowledge of any complex phenomenon. For this, the audio-visual means of learning is imperative which is easily done with the help of videos (at least animated) and computer. For instance, it is difficult for a teacher to make the student understand completely about the reproduction process merely with the help of books and some oral explanations. But, if the students are instructed with the videos, providing detail visual processes involved in reproduction from the fertilization of eggs, its development due to cell division, zygote formation, developmental process of different body parts at different prenatal stages, its movement and other biological processes that takes place till the birth of a baby, then it is no doubt that students will have any doubt regarding this process. Similarly, the advent of computer learning is also essential in the detail study of life cycle of insects and the metamorphosis process. The students will have the vivid images of the changes taking place at any stage in the life of insects and the changes taking place during metamorphosis. This results in a clear understanding about the subject matter under study and is long lasting. Thus, the advent of technology always promotes real learning.
Similarly, audio-visual learning is also effective in imparting real knowledge because the students will be able to see the things exactly what it is. Students will learn easily if they understand the shape, size, color, location, and function of different body parts under study. For instance, different facial bones and cranial bones (which are difficult to show in book) can be easily shown individually with the help of video animation. Their shapes, sizes, locations, and the functions can be easily shown with detailed video explanations due to which students are highly likely to understand about the detail of these bones. Further, video animation is always effective in instructing students about the biological mechanisms taking place in living body such as working of heart, lungs, and etc. Learning simply through the books with rote understanding is not a real learning. A real learning is achieved only when the students are taught with audio-visual explanation of the detail phenomenon.
Further, audio-visual instruction about the past events, places and geographical distribution is equally important for the clear understanding of the students. One cannot understand about these things merely by hearing and reading the books. For instance, the students are likely to forget if they are taught orally about the cause and consequences of the world war. But, if they are taught about this event with the detail audio visual explanations (like a short documentary), I assure you that the student would certainly remember all these events throughout their entire life. Similarly, instructing about the geographical distribution, climatic conditions, and biodiversity of a particular country or continent would also be equally effective if they are instructed with the help video explanations as they will have the images of these things embedded in their mind. Thus, instructing the students with the help of computer, videos and internet always assists in real learning.
In conclusion, I completely disagree with the statement that technology often distracts one from real learning. I believe that technology is always imperative in instructing the students for their real learning as audio-visual instruction not only helps to make them understand about any subject matter but also leaves the vivid image of the whole mechanisms of the subject matter and is often long lasting.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-28 | qsdzlbnwtpzecdeugi | 33 | view |
| 2024-02-19 | Zahid6400 | 75 | view |
| 2024-01-19 | rimpiG | 54 | view |
| 2023-11-09 | Feiyang Wang | 79 | view |
| 2023-08-05 | weonalaz | 58 | view |
- In the United States employees typically work five days a week for eight hours each day However many employees want to work a four day week and are willing to accept less pay in order to do so A mandatory policy requiring companies to offer their employee 76
- The best way to understand the character of a society is to 66
- The following appeared in a memo from the president of Bower Builders a company that constructs new homes A nationwide survey reveals that the two most desired home features are a large family room and a large well appointed kitchen A number of homes in o 16
- Do you agree and disagree with the following statement Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Colleges and universities should require all faculty to spend time working outside the academic world in professions relevant to the courses they teach 70
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 791, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
...g body such as working of heart, lungs, and etc. Learning simply through the books with ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 982, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ternet always assists in real learning. In conclusion, I completely disagree wit...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, regarding, similarly, so, then, therefore, thus, at least, for instance, in conclusion, no doubt, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 19.5258426966 154% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 93.0 58.6224719101 159% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3601.0 2235.4752809 161% => OK
No of words: 667.0 442.535393258 151% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3988005997 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.08196252842 4.55969084622 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93921526158 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 270.0 215.323595506 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.404797601199 0.4932671777 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1108.8 704.065955056 157% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.2370786517 133% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 77.0460820901 60.3974514979 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.37037037 118.986275619 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7037037037 23.4991977007 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.44444444444 5.21951772744 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264910556997 0.243740707755 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0851226504324 0.0831039109588 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.06647577649 0.0758088955206 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194218269767 0.150359130593 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0798912849984 0.0667264976115 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 14.1392134831 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 48.8420337079 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 12.1639044944 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 143.0 100.480337079 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 791, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
...g body such as working of heart, lungs, and etc. Learning simply through the books with ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 982, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ternet always assists in real learning. In conclusion, I completely disagree wit...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, regarding, similarly, so, then, therefore, thus, at least, for instance, in conclusion, no doubt, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 19.5258426966 154% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 93.0 58.6224719101 159% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3601.0 2235.4752809 161% => OK
No of words: 667.0 442.535393258 151% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3988005997 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.08196252842 4.55969084622 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93921526158 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 270.0 215.323595506 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.404797601199 0.4932671777 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1108.8 704.065955056 157% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.2370786517 133% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 77.0460820901 60.3974514979 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.37037037 118.986275619 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7037037037 23.4991977007 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.44444444444 5.21951772744 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264910556997 0.243740707755 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0851226504324 0.0831039109588 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.06647577649 0.0758088955206 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194218269767 0.150359130593 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0798912849984 0.0667264976115 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 14.1392134831 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 48.8420337079 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 12.1639044944 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 143.0 100.480337079 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.