Taking a correct decision at the time is crucial and can have many possibilities of outcome. The statement is suggesting that decisions taken in past cannot affect our present and they have no importance to current ideas. The statement seems ambivalent. We cannot decide whether to support it or oppose it. There are some instances in which past decisions affect the current situation and we have to consider it as a moral. Also, there are some situations in which past decisions do not affect the current one. So, it depends on the situation and we cannot infer that past decisions are not important to today's important issues.
In earlier days, many wars had taken place which had proven deleterious in many places. The decision was taken at that time that conducted war proved moral to the new generation and any authority will not apply the same strategies to protect the nation from the war. So, to not repeat the same mistake, knowing the past is important to not repeat the same. But if a nation is suffering from any crucial problem which they had never faced earlier, to combat the issue, they have to apply new strategies to save the nation from decaying. In that case, no earlier decisions will be available and though knowing about earlier data they have to rely on a new one.
It is a ubiquitous belief that people learn from past mistakes. If a scientist is doing an experiment continuously and having abortive outcome each time, it is important for him to identify wrong decisions he had taken in the past and act accordingly to reach to the desired output. In this case. he has to rely on past decisions to get the success. But, if he is inventing a new technology which cannot relate to any other outcome, and he has to take new decisions to start his experiments.
In sum, it is an ambivalent thought not to reply on past mistakes or past important decisions and we should consider each and every aspect to take right decisions.
- The following appeared in a memo at XYZ company."When XYZ lays off employees, it pays Delany Personnel Firm to offer those employees assistance in creating résumés and developing interviewing skills, if they so desire. Laid-off employees have benefited 23
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant.» You should write at lea 67
- Argument EssayIn recent years, Braeburn Corporation has seen lagging sales of its food products. Just a few of the many food products Braeburn sells are soy products.Soy products have been shown to reduce rates of cancer. Because people care about reducin 33
- 1.Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, arc 23
- Knowing about the past cannot help people to make important decisions today. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 298, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...ch to the desired output. In this case. he has to rely on past decisions to get th...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, if, so, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1612.0 2235.4752809 72% => OK
No of words: 344.0 442.535393258 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68604651163 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55869444299 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 215.323595506 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.468023255814 0.4932671777 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 516.6 704.065955056 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.5049322752 60.3974514979 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.5555555556 118.986275619 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1111111111 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.05555555556 5.21951772744 39% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305626292469 0.243740707755 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101159257304 0.0831039109588 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.085625612528 0.0758088955206 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182514838457 0.150359130593 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0593775793134 0.0667264976115 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 14.1392134831 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 12.1639044944 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 100.480337079 72% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.