The author of this issue states that laws should be enforced flexibly, taking different situations into consideration. Due to the controversial nature of the question, there is not a general argument on this topic. I, however, to a great extent agree with the statement.
By and large, it is established beyond doubt that our laws can not cover every situation in real life, which means that there are a lot of cases could not been defined in current laws. In these cases, rigidly enforcing law, will not only be inapporpriate by also impair the authority of justice. To elucidate more on this issue, let us boldly image that a careless mother wnet into a supermarket and, irresponsibly leaving her little child in the car. The kid was breathening difficultly inside the car and no one could open the door. Fortunately, a man decisively breaked the window and free the boy out. In this case, should the man be sued for breaking other's property and asked for compensation? I bet no one will say yes. We should take the emergency into account, instead of superfacially judging the case based on the physical act itself.
For another thing, the essential of law should be its function that guides people to do well other than punishes and intimidate people. The reminds me of a case happening a few years ago. At the day of the College Entrance Exam in China, a student was late to the examination hall for two minute and was rejected to enter, losing his opportunity to take the exam. This case aroused a big discussion in China lately. Some people said that the student was to be blamed and should take all the responsibility. As a student myself, however, I could totally image how nervous and regretful that student felt at that time, and I am surely to say that he definely would not do it again if it happened one more time. In my opinion, since he has deeply learned a lesson, he deserved one more opportunity. If our laws and rules could not give poeple who sincerely acknowledge their faults a chance, our society certatinly will be filled with hatred.
However, what I alluded to above cannot be overgeneralized to all context. Alongside with the beneficial aspects it has, someone may argue that what if a guy always try to get forgiveness from laws and public but not corrects his behaviour. For the reason, I want to add that the flexbility dose not mean that we tolerate everything blindly but treat them critically.
In light of the reason elaborated, I reiterate that laws should be flexible and critical, taking different circumstances into account. Indeed, the purpose of law is to build a harmony society instead of filling the prisons.
- TPO-24 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?One of the best ways that parents can help their teenage children prepare for adult life is to encourage them to take a part-time job.Use specific reasons and examples 73
- The following appeared in a memo to the board of directors of a company that specializes in the delivery of heating oil Most homes in the northeastern United States where winters are typically cold have traditionally used oil as their major fuel for heati 83
- The human mind will always be superior to machines because machines are only tools of human minds.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In d 58
- An action is morally correct if the amount of good that results from the action is greater than the amount of bad that results from the action. Reason : When assessing the morality of action, the result of an action are more important than the intent of t 58
- University should require every student to take a variety of cources outside the student's field of study. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 631, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ee the boy out. In this case, should the man be sued for breaking others property...
^^
Line 3, column 658, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'others'' or 'other's'?
Suggestion: others'; other's
...e, should the man be sued for breaking others property and asked for compensation? I ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, then, well, another thing, as to, by and large, for another thing, in my opinion, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 33.0505617978 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2203.0 2235.4752809 99% => OK
No of words: 462.0 442.535393258 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7683982684 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63618218583 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75014885341 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 271.0 215.323595506 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58658008658 0.4932671777 119% => OK
syllable_count: 713.7 704.065955056 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.740449438202 135% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.38483146067 251% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.8896022358 60.3974514979 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.7916666667 118.986275619 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.25 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.21951772744 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191997545433 0.243740707755 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0513071902855 0.0831039109588 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0545847973459 0.0758088955206 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115413995627 0.150359130593 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0387585500984 0.0667264976115 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 12.1639044944 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 100.480337079 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.