Leaders are created by the demands that are placed on them.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Leaders bring about social and political change as well as justice for the oppressed and underprivileged people in a society. To tilt the unbalanced scale in a nation to its natural balanced position, people with the ability to lead and command people are a must. But are these leaders created just because of the demands that are placed on them? No. These people take-up charge when a society is in turmoil and is separated based on race, religion, status, etc. Leaders give people a reason to unite and fight for a common cause.
The leaders of a nation are maverick people and they are not driven by demands but rather by the greater good. This is what makes them effective and helps them guide people towards successful change. Mahatma Gandhi, one of the great leaders, the world has ever known was inundated with demands from all sides: the British, the political parties, the freedom fighters but he was tenacious and always did what he felt right which made people followed him with unquestioning obedience. It takes great courage to lead people and even greater courage to not give in to misplaced demands. One who possesses this quality is the one who will come out to be hailed throughout history.
On the other hand, there are instances where leaders are created by demands and I think modern contemporary society is an example. In a democracy, the political leaders are chosen by people and they work to fulfil the demands and solve everyday issues of people. But it is these political heads who have also been in a myriad of controversies for corruption and scams. These people are different from the great leaders who fought for our freedom because here they are reward-driven.
Thus, to conclude, the natural leaders who fought for the people focused only on how to bring about change, how to improve the lives of people. They were altruistic people and that's what attracted people towards them while the modern leaders are not as selfless. This demonstrates the difference between actual leaders and leaders created out of demands.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-29 | batterylow_123 | 58 | view |
| 2024-10-26 | batterylow_123 | 66 | view |
| 2024-10-26 | batterylow_123 | 66 | view |
| 2024-10-25 | batterylow_123 | 50 | view |
| 2024-10-24 | batterylow_123 | 58 | view |
- The council of Maple County concerned about the county s becoming overdeveloped is debating a proposed measure that would prevent the development of existing farmland in the county But the council is also concerned that such a restriction by limiting the 58
- Claim Any piece of information referred to as a fact should be mistrusted since it may well be proven false in the future Reason Much of the information that people assume is factual actually turns out to be inaccurate Write a response in which you discus 58
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain y 66
- The following is a recommendation from the Board of Directors of Monarch Books We recommend that Monarch Books open a caf in its store Monarch having been in business at the same location for more than twenty years has a large customer base because it is 68
- The human mind will always be superior to machines because machines are only tools of human minds Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In de 54
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 177, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...people. They were altruistic people and thats what attracted people towards them whil...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, thus, well, while, i think, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 12.4196629213 16% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1710.0 2235.4752809 76% => OK
No of words: 349.0 442.535393258 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89971346705 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50622168154 2.79657885939 90% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 215.323595506 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.507163323782 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 536.4 704.065955056 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.4037633914 60.3974514979 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.588235294 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5294117647 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.47058823529 5.21951772744 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129674534556 0.243740707755 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0519910861275 0.0831039109588 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0382345238916 0.0758088955206 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0882641461377 0.150359130593 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0147877043567 0.0667264976115 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 14.1392134831 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 100.480337079 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.