In this advancing global world, any country may not compete with other countries in terms of technology & science or educational aspects without the urge to move on learning path with consistency. Learning for all the individuals related of that society is the unit basis to progress in this modern world. The most pivotal factor in learning is the personal appeal of any individual towards his internal integrity and collaboration towards motivations for learning.
No teaching institute can learn a person how to learn. The respective person needs to have self coordination and systematic approach to grasp the things. So it is a basic requirement and preliminary requisite that a person builds the foundation to learn by organizing himself. Yes, the institutions may play a part, but it is mainly on the individual himself to get motivated and seek the passion of how to learn.
For instance, let's take an example. Albert Eienstien was a relatively dull student in his academic phase. His educational institution could not make him motivated towards learning the new concepts. However, he managed and coordinated himself by his own and started to learn advanced concepts making the bases of his own fundamental personal growth. Thomas Edison is the same case in front of us. These two guys were not motivated at all by educations institutions rather they collaborated with themselves and the whole world is having the advantages of their learning / development.
Let's take another example. Srilanka, a small country, is now a much civilized and educated country in the world. But this was not the case with them since long. They had no advanced educational facilities and coaching centers in their country. But this factor did not demoralized the people of Srilanka as they were internally solid and they managed to learn the beliefs and concepts that are compatible with the modern world, without having any resources or educational facilities.
But this is not the case all the time. Sometimes, colleges and universities play a vital role in learning of the individuals. We have the example of Venezuela with us. The circumstances of Venezuela were not the same as we are seeing them now-a-days. They were very fast going on the learning curve as their educational institutions acted as a pillar in their learning. But when there was an economical crises, all the things went to the wrong way as the Venezuela people cannot keep them motivated towards learning aspects and the result is in front of all of us.
So in conclusion, individual's collaboration and coordination is the key to get more productivity in the learning of that individual as well as the overall society. For sure, educational institutions matter in the learning process, but that extent is insignificant and on extremely lower side.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...ges of their learning / development. Lets take another example. Srilanka, a small...
^^^^
Line 7, column 269, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'demoralize'
Suggestion: demoralize
... their country. But this factor did not demoralized the people of Srilanka as they were int...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 294, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to curve'
Suggestion: to curve
...ey were very fast going on the learning curve as their educational institutions acted...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 404, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'cris', 'crise', 'crisis'?
Suggestion: cris; crise; crisis
...rning. But when there was an economical crises, all the things went to the wrong way a...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, well, for instance, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 14.8657303371 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 41.0 33.0505617978 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2362.0 2235.4752809 106% => OK
No of words: 460.0 442.535393258 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1347826087 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6311565067 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96946347195 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.484782608696 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 742.5 704.065955056 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 56.5540533184 60.3974514979 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.8461538462 118.986275619 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6923076923 23.4991977007 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.76923076923 5.21951772744 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.83258426966 228% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177597714331 0.243740707755 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0489189633721 0.0831039109588 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0461767393427 0.0758088955206 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0980931647141 0.150359130593 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0451046017353 0.0667264976115 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 14.1392134831 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 100.480337079 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.