loyalty can be as detrimental an influence as it can be a beneficial one
Loyalty is a very important trait of human beings. People often seek for loyalty in others throughout many situations of their lives. For instance, while choosing for a life partner, loyalty can be regarded as the most important trait to look for. Also, employer hire employees who seem to be loyal and not leave their company very soon. But, loyalty can be as detrimental as it is beneficial. Loyalty may force a person to take irrational decisions as it can cloud their judgements.
People should be loyal to their friends, not abandon them during tough times. But what if the friends are not worth the loyalty? What if the friends are into illicit activities? For instance, a person who is into drugs will surely be a bad influence on his friends. Being loyal to such a friend is can only bring hardships.
Additionally, loyalty in case of institutions can also be equally detrimental. What if the institution indulges in ignoble activities? People loyal to such an institution are forced to do immoral things that they themselves may not approve of. For example, an employee discovers that there are few people in the company who are embezzling money, yet he chooses not to report it as he is loyal to his colleagues and the company. Such an action may result in him getting fired later on. Thus, loyalty came at a cost of him losing his job.
In case of schools, a person may lose out on great opportunities if he remains loyal to his school as there may be other schools which are better than the current one. For instance, a boy lives in a village where the schooling options are not great. If he chooses to stay in the same school even if he is getting an opportunity to go to a better city school then he will be losing out on many things that the good school has to offer.
Thus, loyalty can be as detrimental an influence as it can be a beneficial one if the people you are being loyal to are headed on a wrong path, if the institutions you are being loyal to are corrupt.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-22 | Hardy1991 | 50 | view |
| 2019-06-15 | badaveajinkya | 50 | view |
- dsasd 16
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed. 58
- In the last year’s mayoral election in Town T, candidate Miller led candidate Keating by a substantial margin in the polls leading up to the election. At the last minute, candidate Keating launched a widely viewed series of television advertisements tha 89
- In surveys Mason City residents rank water sports (swimming, boating and fishing) among their favorite recreational activities. The Mason River flowing through the city is rarely used for these pursuits, however, and the city park department devotes littl 82
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 151, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y be other schools which are better than the current one. For instance, a boy liv...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, may, so, then, thus, while, as to, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 19.5258426966 154% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 14.8657303371 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 58.6224719101 72% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1637.0 2235.4752809 73% => OK
No of words: 361.0 442.535393258 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.53462603878 5.05705443957 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59349612964 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 215.323595506 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.476454293629 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 704.065955056 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 6.24550561798 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.6688311197 60.3974514979 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.9523809524 118.986275619 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1904761905 23.4991977007 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.85714285714 5.21951772744 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.436064309347 0.243740707755 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133778826938 0.0831039109588 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.162633266937 0.0758088955206 215% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.285553975323 0.150359130593 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.193735212677 0.0667264976115 290% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.5 14.1392134831 60% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 48.8420337079 146% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 12.1743820225 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.7 12.1639044944 72% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.1 8.38706741573 85% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 100.480337079 60% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.8971910112 46% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.