Luck plays more of a role in determining success than work ethic does.
Luck obviously plays a role in determining success, but I think it is a questionable claim that luck plays a bigger role in that. If someone works hard enough, he has a greater chance of succeeding at a task than someone who depends mostly on luck. Even then, the success story of a hard-working man is somewhat shaped by luck.
First and foremost condition of succeeding at a task is work ethic. Suppose a student is preparing for an exam. He followed his classes regularly and covered everything in the syllabus. However, one of his classmates did not attend classes regularly and only learnt a few chosen topics from the syllabus. Who has a higher chance of securing a better marks in the exam? Most of the people will say the first student as he has the better preparation. The second student will only be able to secure a good marks if all the or most of the questions are from the topics he covered, which mostly depends on luck.
Luck is still involved in success in a minor way. Following up on the example given before, what if the well prepared student suddenly falls ill? Or what if he faces a traffic congestion on his way to the exam hall and reaches the hall 20 minutes late? Will he still be able to secure a good marks? The chances are very low. So even if someone works hard, luck is still involved.
The most important factor in determining success is someone's work ethic. Because a person without any work ethic has a lower chance of success than someone with work ethic. But a person with work ethic still relies on luck to be successful.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-05 | Haymide | 54 | view |
| 2021-08-01 | Geet@3 | 58 | view |
| 2021-07-30 | Sumanayana | 50 | view |
| 2021-07-30 | Sumanayana | 54 | view |
| 2021-07-16 | Himanshi Rana | 50 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 35, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a minor way" with adverb for "minor"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... Luck is still involved in success in a minor way. Following up on the example given befo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 19, column 74, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...rmining success is someones work ethic. Because a person without any work ethic has a l...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, still, then, well, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 33.0505617978 39% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 58.6224719101 58% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1301.0 2235.4752809 58% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 285.0 442.535393258 64% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.5649122807 5.05705443957 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.55969084622 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47144106333 2.79657885939 88% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 215.323595506 67% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.508771929825 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 399.6 704.065955056 57% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.8199149055 60.3974514979 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 68.4736842105 118.986275619 58% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 15.0 23.4991977007 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.31578947368 5.21951772744 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.327986745063 0.243740707755 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101719361836 0.0831039109588 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122090977175 0.0758088955206 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.228357787466 0.150359130593 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.161676337292 0.0667264976115 242% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.5 14.1392134831 53% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 48.8420337079 150% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 12.1743820225 56% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.58 12.1639044944 71% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 100.480337079 58% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.