Many important discoveries or creations are accidental: it is usually while seeking the answer to one question that we come across the answer to another.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Discoveries and inventions form the backbone of human evolvement, with new advances in fields of medicine, technology, and sciences delivering new resources to human development.
These discoveries require a lot of rigorous research and analysis efforts, with analysts/scientists working for years to produce something substantial. With the help of new tools, we surely have aided the research efforts but as we grow every day the problems that we face eventually increase in complexity, whose solutions are convoluted. Thus, the field of research and inventions is an ever-growing one with new requirements/problems popping up now and then.
The research efforts whether in the field of engineering or medical science or economics though given ample resources and time may not always turn out efficacious. Since we are trying to find a solution to a problem never faced before we cannot always be sure that efforts would be effective. What is also an amazing factor about creations is that although most of them are intentional, produced through years of work and deliberate plans and efforts, some of the discoveries are indeed accidental! I agree with the statement that sometimes discoveries are accidental, and they give us answers to questions entirely different from those we had.
For example - A research team working to develop a product to reduce engine fuel consumption follows a plan and invents a product. On testing it they find out that it does not reduce fuel consumption, but the tests found out that a specific compound used in the product could filter out the carbon waste much better than the traditional compounds that are in use. Thus, they were not able to produce an efficient fuel consumption product, but they ended up finding an entirely new compound.
These accidental discoveries may bring forth ideas that we may never have explored before. They might be solutions to anticipated problems or be cardinal to improving the already existing products. They might open an entirely new line of study which will further help the development in that field. Some might argue that nothing is accidental, that when chemical A is mixed with chemical B will produce chemical C, but just because the scientist missed a phenomenon, he expected it to produce chemical D. Thus, claiming that it is not accidental but merely a mistaken effort. Although this claim might be true in some cases it does not necessarily mean that the accidental discoveries made are not useful, also since we are trying to find/invent something that has never existed these mistakes can be condoned.
It is also true that in some cases where the invention is urgent and must produce something that solves the matter at hand, we must keep aside the accidental inventions for later investigations and concentrate on the matter at hand. Thus, I believe that an invention or a creation whether produced through deliberate efforts or by an accident is equally important for our growth. With each having its significant contribution to the development and the problems we face.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-10-15 | Omar Ibna Nazim | 16 | view |
2023-08-02 | okazaki11 | 80 | view |
2023-07-26 | jayauen | 83 | view |
2023-02-10 | Yam Kumar Oli | 58 | view |
2023-01-06 | wwwqaq111 | 83 | view |
- Claim Even though young people often receive the advice to follow your dreams more emphasis should be placed on picking worthy goals Reason Many people s dreams are inherently selfish 50
- The following appeared as part of a petition sent to residents of Youngtown by an environmental protection group The Smith Corporation should not be permitted to develop the land that is now part of the Youngtown Wildlife Preserve This sanctuary is essent 74
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered to decide whether the recommendation is likely to have the 54
- Many important discoveries or creations are accidental it is usually while seeking the answer to one question that we come across the answer to another Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and 83
- The luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life prevent people from developing into truly strong and independent individuals Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning f 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ents/problems popping up now and then. The research efforts whether in the fiel...
^^^
Line 4, column 165, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...me may not always turn out efficacious. Since we are trying to find a solution to a p...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 453, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... work and deliberate plans and efforts, some of the discoveries are indeed accidental! I ag...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d up finding an entirely new compound. These accidental discoveries may bring f...
^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...xisted these mistakes can be condoned. It is also true that in some cases where...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, then, thus, for example, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 14.8657303371 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 11.3162921348 186% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 33.0505617978 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2575.0 2235.4752809 115% => OK
No of words: 499.0 442.535393258 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16032064128 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72634191566 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98195841688 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 253.0 215.323595506 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507014028056 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 802.8 704.065955056 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.7698324568 60.3974514979 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.526315789 118.986275619 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2631578947 23.4991977007 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.26315789474 5.21951772744 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126836368875 0.243740707755 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0404222116246 0.0831039109588 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0399193796642 0.0758088955206 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0668865065464 0.150359130593 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0427334932201 0.0667264976115 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 14.1392134831 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 100.480337079 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.8971910112 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.