Many important discoveries or creations are accidental: it is usually while seeking the answer to one question that we come across the answer to another.
The author of this statement claims the many of important discoveries and creations are accidentally. As far as I am concerned, this assertion was true in the past, while in the modern age most discoveries are gained by logical procedures.
First at all, scientist and researchers use the trail and errors in the past. Therefore, it is quite normal they have faced many unpredictable results, which may were important than what they wanted to find. I think that a small example can give some light to this matter. When Henry Becquerel, who was a famous chemist, work on phosphorescence activities on certain materials, he found that some of them can emission light without exposure on the sun. Hence, he concluded that some materials have special properties that he called radioactivity. Therefore, he accidentally found a great discovery, which led him to gain the Nobel Prize.
In contrast, nowadays, the scenario is more different than what was previously, and researchers have to use scientific approaches for discovery new things in the most cases. In fact, the trail and error is costly and time consuming. As we all know, in the university students learn that before starting any experiment, they should spend much time for collecting data. In this way, it is apparent their results of finding will base on the measurement approaches, not accidental. I think that there is not a better example than radioactive experiments. Scientist measure many chemical reactions with mathematics, and simulate them in the computers before they start their experiments. Indeed, they can predict a great percentage of the results in the research level, and they rarely face with unforeseen results.
In sum, it is acceptable many of discoveries in the past base on accidental events. However, modern scientists always use the scientific procedure, which decreases the possibility of unpredictable results, for their experiments.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-25 | batterylow_123 | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-15 | Omar Ibna Nazim | 16 | view |
| 2023-08-02 | okazaki11 | 80 | view |
| 2023-07-26 | jayauen | 83 | view |
| 2023-02-10 | Yam Kumar Oli | 58 | view |
- Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities. 70
- Many people visit museums when they travel to new places. Why do you think people visit museums? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 94
- Some people like to do only what they already do well. Other people prefer to try new things and take risks. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your choice. 70
- TPO-23 - Integrated Writing Task Populations of the yellow cedar, a species of tree that is common in northwestern North America, have been steadily declining for more than a century now, since about 1880. Scientists have advanced several hypotheses expla 80
- The following appeared in an article written by Dr. Karp, an anthropologist."Twenty years ago, Dr. Field, a noted anthropologist, visited the island of Tertia and concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rat 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 55, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[2]
Message: Did you mean 'different 'from''? 'Different than' is often considered colloquial style.
Suggestion: from
...owadays, the scenario is more different than what was previously, and researchers ha...
^^^^
Line 5, column 562, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Scientist) must be used with a third-person verb: 'measures'.
Suggestion: measures
...than radioactive experiments. Scientist measure many chemical reactions with mathematic...
^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['first', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'therefore', 'while', 'i think', 'in contrast', 'in fact']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.217142857143 0.240241500013 90% => OK
Verbs: 0.134285714286 0.157235817809 85% => OK
Adjectives: 0.108571428571 0.0880659088768 123% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0485714285714 0.0497285424764 98% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0657142857143 0.0444667217837 148% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.131428571429 0.12292977631 107% => OK
Participles: 0.0171428571429 0.0406280797675 42% => Some participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 3.04749893061 2.79330140395 109% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0114285714286 0.030933414821 37% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0971428571429 0.0997080785238 97% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0171428571429 0.0249443105267 69% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.02 0.0148568991511 135% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1930.0 2732.02544248 71% => OK
No of words: 307.0 452.878318584 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.28664495114 6.0361032391 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.58838876751 91% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.355048859935 0.366273622748 97% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.28338762215 0.280924506359 101% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.237785016287 0.200843997647 118% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.192182410423 0.132149295362 145% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04749893061 2.79330140395 109% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 219.290929204 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.579804560261 0.48968727796 118% => OK
Word variations: 62.9905410523 55.4138127331 114% => OK
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6194690265 82% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0588235294 23.380412469 77% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.4392115638 59.4972553346 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.529411765 141.124799967 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0588235294 23.380412469 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.647058823529 0.674092028746 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.94800884956 81% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.21349557522 38% => OK
Readability: 46.3975857444 51.4728631049 90% => OK
Elegance: 1.47126436782 1.64882698954 89% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272995438525 0.391690518653 70% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.108082613115 0.123202303941 88% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0564467596253 0.077325440228 73% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.486511719921 0.547984918172 89% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.142418976088 0.149214159877 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104483053081 0.161403998019 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0462211582243 0.0892212321368 52% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.297397970571 0.385218514788 77% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0944381801482 0.0692045440612 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192749321925 0.275328986314 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0193765709847 0.0653680567796 30% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.4325221239 96% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.30420353982 57% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88274336283 82% => OK
Positive topic words: 4.0 7.22455752212 55% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.66592920354 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 2.70907079646 148% => OK
Total topic words: 10.0 13.5995575221 74% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.