Many important discoveries or creations are accidental: it is usually while seeking the answer to one question that we come across the answer to another.
The author of this statement claims the many of important discoveries and creations are accidentally. As far as I am concerned, this assertion was true in the past, while in the modern age most discoveries are gained by logical procedures.
First at all, scientist and researchers use the trail and errors in the past. Therefore, it is quite normal they have faced many unpredictable results, which may were important than what they wanted to find. I think that a small example can give some light to this matter. When Henry Becquerel, who was a famous chemist, work on phosphorescence activities on certain materials, he found that some of them can emission light without exposure on the sun. Hence, he concluded that some materials have special properties that he called radioactivity.
In contrast, nowadays, the scenario is more different than what was previously, and researchers have to use scientific approaches for discovery new things in the most cases. In fact, the trail and error is costly and time consuming. I think that there is not a better example than radioactive experiments. Scientist measure many chemical reactions with mathematics, and simulate them in the computers before they start their experiments. Indeed, they can predict a great percentage of the results in the research level, and they rarely face with unforeseen results.
In sum, it is acceptable many of discoveries in the past base on accidental events. However, modern scientists always use the scientific procedure, which decreases the possibility of unpredictable results, for their experiments.
- When famous people such as actors, athletes and rock stars give their opinions, many people listen. Do you think we should pay attention to these opinions? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 40
- A company has announced that it wishes to build a large factory near your community. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this new influence on your community. Do you support or oppose the factory? Explain your position. 76
- Young people should be encouraged to pursue long-term, realistic goals rather than seek immediate fame and recognition.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the po 79
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Television, newspapers, magazines, and other media pay too much attention to the personal lives of famous people such as public figures and celebrities. Use specific reasons and details to explain you 70
- Young people should be encouraged to pursue long-term, realistic goals rather than seek immediate fame and recognition. 16
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 55, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[2]
Message: Did you mean 'different 'from''? 'Different than' is often considered colloquial style.
Suggestion: from
...owadays, the scenario is more different than what was previously, and researchers ha...
^^^^
Line 5, column 317, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Scientist) must be used with a third-person verb: 'measures'.
Suggestion: measures
...than radioactive experiments. Scientist measure many chemical reactions with mathematic...
^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['first', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'therefore', 'while', 'i think', 'in contrast', 'in fact']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.227272727273 0.240241500013 95% => OK
Verbs: 0.122377622378 0.157235817809 78% => OK
Adjectives: 0.118881118881 0.0880659088768 135% => OK
Adverbs: 0.048951048951 0.0497285424764 98% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0594405594406 0.0444667217837 134% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.132867132867 0.12292977631 108% => OK
Participles: 0.00699300699301 0.0406280797675 17% => Some participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 3.06578374684 2.79330140395 110% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0104895104895 0.030933414821 34% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0944055944056 0.0997080785238 95% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.013986013986 0.0249443105267 56% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.020979020979 0.0148568991511 141% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1595.0 2732.02544248 58% => OK
No of words: 252.0 452.878318584 56% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.32936507937 6.0361032391 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.58838876751 87% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.365079365079 0.366273622748 100% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.289682539683 0.280924506359 103% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.242063492063 0.200843997647 121% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.198412698413 0.132149295362 150% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06578374684 2.79330140395 110% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 219.290929204 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.595238095238 0.48968727796 122% => OK
Word variations: 61.6573826129 55.4138127331 111% => OK
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6194690265 68% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.380412469 77% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.1471372665 59.4972553346 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.928571429 141.124799967 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 23.380412469 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.785714285714 0.674092028746 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.94800884956 81% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.21349557522 38% => OK
Readability: 46.9682539683 51.4728631049 91% => OK
Elegance: 1.59090909091 1.64882698954 96% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261219620604 0.391690518653 67% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.107301877176 0.123202303941 87% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0649097235931 0.077325440228 84% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.518823210247 0.547984918172 95% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.151800921061 0.149214159877 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104526511262 0.161403998019 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0504611241947 0.0892212321368 57% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.265432224915 0.385218514788 69% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0767992426568 0.0692045440612 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181891688551 0.275328986314 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0271835173139 0.0653680567796 42% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.4325221239 77% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.30420353982 57% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88274336283 61% => OK
Positive topic words: 4.0 7.22455752212 55% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.66592920354 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.70907079646 111% => OK
Total topic words: 9.0 13.5995575221 66% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.