"Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas in which the disease is detected.However since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations,we cannot permit inoculations against cow flu to be routinely administered."
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
I would disagree with the argument as there are many statement which is based on assumption. if these assumptions were stated clearly we can conclude.
It states that if cow flu is administered it might have saved the people of the residing area from dying.
We cannot assume that the people in the area are only dying cause of the cow flu and not any other disease. In case the author might have stated that there was no other disease widespread in the residing area other than cow flu. This statement would have been valid.
Author than continues to say that there is possibility the people will die even after vaccination. The author has not mentioned which vaccination was given to the person and what was the disease that the person was affected with. The statement is too vague and not clearly stated.
What if the person was detected with malaria and he was given vaccination for polio. This will not help the patient and it will only worsen his case and he might die.
So the author has to be very precise when he mentioned that the person will die if vaccination is given.
So by the statement of the author we cannot end if vaccination against the cow flu should be routine done or not. The author has to be more lucid to prove his claim.
- "According to a recent report by our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any other year. And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen movi 55
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 50
- "Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas in which the disease is detected.However since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations,we cannot 33
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. 50
- All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary. 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 49, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun statement seems to be countable; consider using: 'many statements'.
Suggestion: many statements
...disagree with the argument as there are many statement which is based on assumption. if these ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 94, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...statement which is based on assumption. if these assumptions were stated clearly w...
^^
Line 1, column 94, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “if” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...statement which is based on assumption. if these assumptions were stated clearly w...
^^
Line 25, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... be more lucid to prove his claim.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 58.6224719101 32% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1060.0 2235.4752809 47% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 228.0 442.535393258 52% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.64912280702 5.05705443957 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 4.55969084622 85% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31364118191 2.79657885939 83% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 215.323595506 51% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.482456140351 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 324.9 704.065955056 46% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.870051954 60.3974514979 46% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 75.7142857143 118.986275619 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2857142857 23.4991977007 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.928571428571 5.21951772744 18% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.97078651685 141% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 10.2758426966 19% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285585239312 0.243740707755 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0957738740146 0.0831039109588 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0702685519852 0.0758088955206 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140671884237 0.150359130593 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0511179314228 0.0667264976115 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.6 14.1392134831 61% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 48.8420337079 148% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 12.1743820225 59% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.39 12.1639044944 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.92 8.38706741573 83% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 100.480337079 36% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.8971910112 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.