Men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks. "
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
In the wake of recent agitations on equality of the genders, it is easy to understand why anyone, at the first glasnce, could scoff at the claim that men and women are not equally suited for many task because of their inherent physical differences. However, if one takes a critical look at the argument, one will realize that it has some merits to it and should not be dismissed. I believe that this claim is true due to two fundamental reasons - history and biology.
First, one has to consider the tasks the genders have been mostly suited for over the human history to see the merits in this claim. Historically, even at the early times of man's occupation on earth, men have had to do more physically exerting tasks like gathering, hunting, fighting wars and so on. This must been because that is what they are mostly suited for from the evolutionary perspective as the only need of those early human was to survive in a tough clime, not prove a point. As evolution has shown us, species that must survive must structure its society in a way that would ensure their survival. We can see similar trends in other species such as ants, bees, gorillas and so on. It is then no surprise that even today in tasks like athletics where the a lot of physical exertions is needed and the measure of success is very objective, men have an average higher success than women. For example, the top hundred fastest runners in history only consists of about 20 women. Thus, from the historical and evolutionary perspective, the two gender have been built for different tasks and thus cannot be equally suited.
Furthermore, one also has to consider the current human body biology and physiology. Scientists have shown time and time again that the body structures of the two genders are different. The two genders have different hormonal levels, bone strWhile the man body is more suited to protect, the female body is more suited to nuture. This could also be understood from the evolutioanry perspective, each gender developed in such a way to help fully optimize the value that they can give to the society, While things are changing rapidly now with less reliance on physical work and more on mental, we still have to consider this difference in bone structure, hormones and so on. Unless the two genders are equal in all ways physically, they cannot be the equally suited to the same set of tasks.
In conclusion, one might argue that anyone across the gender can achieve any task if they put their mind to it and train hard. However, this is simply not true. While there might be few individuals across both genders that can be as good as any other person in the other gender in task suited for that gender, this is just a case of an outlier and should not be used to draw general conclusion. What is true for one is not necessarily true for all and what is true for all may not necessarily be true for one. However, it is clear that on average, men and women are not equally suited for many tasks due to their inherent physical differences
- Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader, it is not as important as a leader’s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers. 66
- ISSUE TOPIC: The real talent of a popular musician cannot accurately be assessed until the musician has been dead for several generations, so that his or her fame does not interfere with honest assessment. 58
- The following appeared in a memo from the director of a large group of hospitals."In a laboratory study of liquid antibacterial hand soaps, a concentrated solution of UltraClean produced a 40 percent greater reduction in the bacteria population than 52
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. 75
- Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the 62
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 192, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun task seems to be countable; consider using: 'many tasks'.
Suggestion: many tasks
...en and women are not equally suited for many task because of their inherent physical diff...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 311, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[2]
Message: Did you mean 'have been' or 'be'?
Suggestion: have been; be
...ing, fighting wars and so on. This must been because that is what they are mostly su...
^^^^
Line 5, column 763, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'a' is left.
Suggestion: the; a
...ven today in tasks like athletics where the a lot of physical exertions is needed and...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 602, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ysical work and more on mental, we still have to consider this difference in bone...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, however, if, look, may, so, still, then, thus, while, as to, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 32.0 19.6327345309 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.9520958084 147% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 11.1786427146 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 13.6137724551 103% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 28.8173652695 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 63.0 55.5748502994 113% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 16.3942115768 30% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2506.0 2260.96107784 111% => OK
No of words: 541.0 441.139720559 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.63216266174 5.12650576532 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.82280071112 4.56307096286 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45515877945 2.78398813304 88% => OK
Unique words: 250.0 204.123752495 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.462107208872 0.468620217663 99% => OK
syllable_count: 803.7 705.55239521 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 4.96107784431 222% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 8.76447105788 46% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.70958083832 185% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.22255489022 95% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 19.7664670659 106% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.8473053892 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.446157244 57.8364921388 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.333333333 119.503703932 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7619047619 23.324526521 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.80952380952 5.70786347227 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.25449101796 76% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.20758483034 134% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 6.88822355289 73% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.67664670659 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188185365966 0.218282227539 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.060144849499 0.0743258471296 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0679974610113 0.0701772020484 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129659263 0.128457276422 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0420045699474 0.0628817314937 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 14.3799401198 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 48.3550499002 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.197005988 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.87 12.5979740519 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.32208582834 92% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 98.500998004 95% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 12.3882235529 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.1389221557 108% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.