Men and women because of their inherent physical differences are not equally suited for many tasks Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure to address

Essay topics:

Men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.

The age-old controversy of gender inequality has lived on for many years, although it has been seen decreasing in recent years the topic of physical differences still lives on. The prompt mentions the effect of inherent physical differences of gender on many tasks. In my opinion, I moderately disagree with this statement and argue that to some extent this suggestion is true for two reasons.

Firstly, although inherent physical differences still exist there has been a sharp increase in the amount of participation of women in tasks, For instance, women in past are treated as a person to only maintain household jobs and are more likely to get an education only up to a certain extent, However, this changing rapidly as more and more woman getting fully educated resulting in the competition of jobs which were once only held by the men in the past.

Lastly, some tasks still require some unique characteristics like physical strength

Votes
Average: 3.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-08-11 Anish Sapkota 50 view
2023-08-10 Anish Sapkota 66 view
2023-08-04 DCAD123 50 view
2023-01-23 Pranav Lohote 66 view
2022-10-02 motherastronaut12 58 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user Vincent Samuel :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 84, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e characteristics like physical strength
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, lastly, so, still, for instance, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 19.5258426966 31% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 12.4196629213 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 14.8657303371 20% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 11.3162921348 18% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 33.0505617978 21% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 58.6224719101 46% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 791.0 2235.4752809 35% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 156.0 442.535393258 35% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07051282051 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53411884305 4.55969084622 78% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74445079946 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 215.323595506 47% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.647435897436 0.4932671777 131% => OK
syllable_count: 251.1 704.065955056 36% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 20.2370786517 25% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 23.0359550562 135% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 139.840766588 60.3974514979 232% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 158.2 118.986275619 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.2 23.4991977007 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 15.0 5.21951772744 287% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.97078651685 60% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 10.2758426966 19% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180148499129 0.243740707755 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0919053595003 0.0831039109588 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0285070760554 0.0758088955206 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105232012227 0.150359130593 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0426553524312 0.0667264976115 64% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 14.1392134831 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 48.8420337079 82% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 12.1743820225 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.72 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 100.480337079 40% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 11.2143820225 128% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.