Men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks.
Since the dawn of time, when humans were still referenced under the term 'Homo Sapien', there have been different situations and tasks for which each of the gender were equally skillful and capable at. As and when with the advent of technology, our responsibilites as well as the way we do things have become efficient as well. Since the 90s and even in the prehistoric days, men have been drafted to wars to fight for their country, provide for their family by going in the wild and hunting for food with their bare hands. Due to the superior bone density, agileness, strength, men are still capable of doing these things. In a situation like this, it wasnt feasible for women to do this as they were skillful at different things which men werent at. This statement doesnt mean that women aren't capable, it just signifies that women were suited for different tasks but not those where physical proficiency doesnt play to their strengths
Women have been incredibly successful by providing a family, taking care of the household and the children, providing food and shelter for his/her family. They turn out to be great mothers and a source of inspiration for their children to become something in life. They are multi-talented and are pragmatic in their way to deal with life.
Thus, with this I conclude by saying due to their biological and physical differences, men and women are capable of establishing many wonderful things, but shall fail to do so by mixing up the roles which both aren't adaptive to.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-02 | Mahima1902 | 54 | view |
| 2023-08-23 | Krisha Lakhani | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-11 | Anish Sapkota | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-10 | Anish Sapkota | 66 | view |
| 2023-08-04 | DCAD123 | 50 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 652, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wasn't
...se things. In a situation like this, it wasnt feasible for women to do this as they w...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 740, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: weren't
... skillful at different things which men werent at. This statement doesnt mean that wom...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 766, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ngs which men werent at. This statement doesnt mean that women arent capable, it just ...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 789, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
.... This statement doesnt mean that women arent capable, it just signifies that women w...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 906, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ut not those where physical proficiency doesnt play to their strengths Women have b...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 211, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
...do so by mixing up the roles which both arent adaptive to.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, still, thus, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 12.4196629213 8% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 58.6224719101 68% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1252.0 2235.4752809 56% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 260.0 442.535393258 59% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81538461538 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.55969084622 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54946333835 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 215.323595506 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.561538461538 0.4932671777 114% => OK
syllable_count: 378.9 704.065955056 54% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 20.2370786517 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 23.0359550562 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 79.3656952357 60.3974514979 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.111111111 118.986275619 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.8888888889 23.4991977007 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.21951772744 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.97078651685 60% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.333093261427 0.243740707755 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117732174307 0.0831039109588 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0766140706802 0.0758088955206 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192917258587 0.150359130593 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0850827469319 0.0667264976115 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 14.1392134831 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.27 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 100.480337079 52% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.2143820225 118% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.