The most effective way to understand contemporary culture is to analyze the trends of its youth.

Whether or not examining the trends among a society’s youth is the best way to understand its contemporary culture is a controversial issue. The statement certainly has some truth to it since young people are often the forerunners of cultural trends. However, it would be too assertive to state that the young generation is the only player in contemporary culture. As a matter of fact, the population of young people under the age of 25 composes 40% of the whole population. While it is a relatively high percentage, to limit oneself to the study of youth trend is to ignore the rest 60% of the world population. This essay argues that trends among young people, while a major factor in contemporary culture, cannot represent the general culture of contemporary society.

To begin with, young people are certainly major players in contemporary culture. Whether in arts, music, theater, or fashion, it is usually the younger generation who are dominating and exerting influences on the change of cultural trends. The reason is that young spirits are often bald and fearless; they are most sensitive to changes in trends and are willing to embrace change. To give a specific example, the music on ranking agencies such as Billboards is largely determined by the youth, who are the main audience of new music. Therefore, it is safe to state that young people are often the major influencers of contemporary culture.

However, aside from the younger generation, other generations that make up 60% of the population also have their own distinctive trends that are indispensable to the larger cultural scene. For instance, in contemporary Chinese society, middle-aged and retired women are starting a trend of square-dancing. Organized groups of women would come out in the evening in public squares and parks to dance as a way of exercising and socializing. Though often despised by young people, this trend is a unique scene in contemporary Chinese culture. Therefore, focusing one’s analysis on youth trend would result in ignorance of trends in the older generations that are also part of the cultural environment.

Moreover, different social norms and mores among different generations often pose powerful cultural dichotomy, which is another important aspect of the larger contemporary culture. Let’s take contemporary Japanese society as an example. The older generation often has a more traditional value of work ethics. They are usually devoted to one company for the entire work life, employ methodical working habits and are willing to work overtime for the sake of the company. The younger generation, on the other hand, adopts an entirely different view. They do not see the purpose of their work as contribution to the company and society. They work for their own sakes and are unwilling to sacrifice private time to finish their work. Moreover, young people are less likely to stay in one company for the rest of their lives. Rather, they are more inclined to explore different fields to find their passion. The disparaging work ethics between the older and the younger generation is thus a unique scene in contemporary Japanese society that cannot be overlooked.

In conclusion, although the statement might seem true at first sight in that young people exert large influence on contemporary pop culture, a close examination of the other population would reveal how problematic the assertion is. Other generations not only have their own unique cultural trends but also poses intriguing dichotomy with the youth, both of which are indispensable to the examination of contemporary culture.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'Whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: Whether
Whether or not examining the trends among a society&ap...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, moreover, so, therefore, thus, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a matter of fact, to begin with, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 32.0 19.5258426966 164% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 81.0 58.6224719101 138% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 12.9106741573 170% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3046.0 2235.4752809 136% => OK
No of words: 582.0 442.535393258 132% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23367697595 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.91168771031 4.55969084622 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91048454338 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 264.0 215.323595506 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.453608247423 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 987.3 704.065955056 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.2370786517 138% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6755568747 60.3974514979 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.785714286 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7857142857 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.92857142857 5.21951772744 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246410757977 0.243740707755 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.068464321687 0.0831039109588 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0826257752525 0.0758088955206 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154103252988 0.150359130593 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0830034873588 0.0667264976115 124% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 14.1392134831 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 48.8420337079 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 100.480337079 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.