Shaping the society is essential for the betterment of humanity. The youth is a delicate part of our society. Shaping the minds of youngsters of today is necessary for the benefit and welfare of society. Certainly, if an individual has a position of authority, he can have additional power or resources with the help of which he can create a better society. The issue mentioned by the author might be relevant in some cases. But, it is not necessary that youngsters should acquire a position of authority in order to shape a society. An individual can contribute to a society while he/she is working on a ground level as well.
Consider, for example if a person if working as a police officer, he can contribute for the betterment of the society by reducing the crime rate in the area he is being appointed. But, even an ordinary employee of a company can make sure that there are not any malpractices happening in his surroundings. If he finds something suspicious, he can immediately report it to the nearby police station which can help the police to investigate on time.
Consider a scenario where a youngster who is a university topper of his batch is elected as the education minister of a nation. He will certainly have precise knowledge about different education policies and curriculums implemented across the nation. He will try the best of his efforts to increase literacy rate of the nation. Also, being a recent graduate, he knows how to inculcate cognitive skills in students and can implement many education policies for the betterment of students.
If the youngsters of today do not have the instict to collaborate with each other, it will surely affect them and the society to which they belong to. This will increase rivalry among them and will eventually lead to the worsening of current condition of the society. But, if they have collaboration skills imbibed within themselves, they can share individual knowledge with each other which will help them shape a society in a better way they have dreamt of.
In conclusion, we can say that setting can youngsters for positions of authority in different fields can be an ideal path for a society but, even if it is not done, the youth can contribute to the best of their knowledge for the betterment of society. Also, having collaborative skills will essentially help them to achieve the best of their efforts.
- Policies that focuses on protecting environment should not be imposed on multinational organizations as they generate profit and boost the economy even though they cause damage to the environment 50
- The main objective of education is to procure a job 50
- The following appeared as a letter to the editor from a citizen to Preston County It has been observed over the past three years that the reports of damage and destruction of public property have steadily increased in Preston County At the same time it ha 70
- Colleges and universities should require their students to spend at least one semester studying in a foreign country 50
- The diagram below shows how instant noodles are manufactured Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 35, Rule ID: IF_IS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'is'?
Suggestion: is
.... Consider, for example if a person if working as a police officer, he can con...
^^
Line 9, column 352, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...m to achieve the best of their efforts.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 12.4196629213 177% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1982.0 2235.4752809 89% => OK
No of words: 407.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86977886978 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49157444576 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83679847374 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 215.323595506 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.454545454545 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 643.5 704.065955056 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.8476630232 60.3974514979 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.315789474 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4210526316 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.84210526316 5.21951772744 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188034182525 0.243740707755 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0619260544408 0.0831039109588 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0546280337096 0.0758088955206 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116243223338 0.150359130593 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0614435631384 0.0667264976115 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 100.480337079 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.