Most people choose a career on the basis of such pragmatic considerations as the needs of the economy, the relative ease of finding a job, and the salary they can expect to make. Hardly anyone is free to choose a career based on his or her natural talents or interest in a particular work.
The speaker claims that, owing to economic pressure, people are hardly free to follow their own talents and will but choose their job from pragmatic concern. Admittedly, sometimes people who are not born in wealth-dividend, they are struggle for their sustenance so yielding to pragmatism. However, with the advance of the society, nowadays people have more chance to pursue their will in the their lives.
I concede that, from the history, people usually succumb to the pressure of their living and therefore turn to find the job that can sustain their living. After all, we are living creature: we need food to replenish the energy we consumed; we need various commodities to maintain our everyday live work. All these material stuff need money. Compared to pursing the goal that fit your interest, having a stable job is sometimes indispensable. Take the famous scientist, Einstein, as an example. Before he won the prestige in the field of academic, he worked in a patent office for his livelihood. Although the task may be boring and routine, but it is a practical choice that provided Einstein with ability to sustain himself.
However, with the development of the society, nowadays this world afford us more opportunity to chasing the goal that meet our interest and talent without sacrificing the livelihood. At school, there are various of scholarship and financial support can be applied by talented students. No matter a student is adept in mathematic, science, or art, there are plenty of corresponding resource can help them. In the society, on the contrary of those impecunious artists in the past, people who are skillful in art field have more resources to promote their works. The Internet helps them promote their works in the global scale, so that there are more people can appreciate their works and support them. Considering that, if Van Gogh live in modern society, the mishap:the only one paint was sold in his live, may not happen by virtue of the influence of the broad-covered media today.
Another reason that people today have more opportunity in choosing their job matching their interests and talents is that modern society is a society of cooperation. In detail, today’s society needs talented people in specific area but not people who know everything. In the ancient time, it is necessary for every family to contribute to the work directly to their livings, such as hunting or farming. By contrast, in modern society, people are work together in cooperative way. Some people work in food industry, some contribute theirselves in constructing building while some people are in charge to entertain the public on media. As a result, it is not necessary for human to perform routine work for the living. Instead, people who possess different skills are more valuable. In this sense, people have more chances and even be a necessity to develop their personal and unique skills.
In sum, in modern society, human beings have more opportunities to work in the fields that we are interested in or talented in. It largely comes from the transition of mode of our lives and also the plenty of resources nowadays provide to us.
- Only through mistakes can there be discovery or progress 75
- No field of study can advance significantly unless outsiders bring their knowledge and experience to that field of study 83
- It is the artist not the critic who gives society something of lasting value 58
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Parents today are more involved in their children s education than were parents in the past Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- The chief benefit of the study of history is to break down the illusion that people in one period of time are significantly different from people who lived at any other time in history 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 390, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'their'?
Suggestion: the; their
...ave more chance to pursue their will in the their lives. I concede that, from the hist...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, therefore, while, after all, such as, as a result, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 33.0505617978 163% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 77.0 58.6224719101 131% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2640.0 2235.4752809 118% => OK
No of words: 525.0 442.535393258 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02857142857 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.78673985869 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69001614272 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 269.0 215.323595506 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512380952381 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 829.8 704.065955056 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 17.0 4.38483146067 388% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.2004207204 60.3974514979 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.538461538 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1923076923 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.80769230769 5.21951772744 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134554387334 0.243740707755 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0391677330841 0.0831039109588 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0390747383013 0.0758088955206 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0775158070293 0.150359130593 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0378772086484 0.0667264976115 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 133.0 100.480337079 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.