A recent article on the inquisitiveness of children startled everyone who read it. In a famous space blog, a scientist posted a question online which was asked by his four year old daughter, surprising everyone with the curiosity and the simplicity and the imagination that a child can afford. She asked her father that if sun was a big ball of fire (as he simplified it to her), what would happen if we throw the exact same amount of water on sun? Will the fire get extinguished? We, as adults can never ask such simple yet striking questions as we are so busy in concentrating the minute details hence overlooking the big picture.
Most importantly, we can never let our imagination run as wild as them.
If human beings could not have imagined and spun fairy tales centering moon, maybe we could have never reached moon. If we had not imagined to travel faster than running, maybe transportation could never prevail. We, rational beings have come this far following a simple principle : imagine, experiment, implement, gain knowledge and again imagine. Starting from Sir Issac Newton, Leonardo DaVinci, John Lennon, Mahatma Gandhi to Mark Zuckerberg, all of them were visionaries before anything else. Today, the world creates a million engineers, doctors, scientists per year, but then, why is fossil fuel still a dependence? Why has cancer not yet been cured? Why has the world not got it's next Einstein or Madam Curie or Tagore?
The answer is simple. We are spoon-feeding the future with pre-gained knowledge only. We oppose unconventional ideas tabooing them bizarre. A century back, the concept of hyper-loop was eccentric as well. We confine imagination in such a stringent way that a thousand innovations are nipped to buds. We, as conscious rational beings should encourage the absurd, the unorthodox ideas because that is the key to unlock the genius in and among us.
The world will be a placate place without the palette of imagination. Knowledge will teach us to not repeat the same mistakes and give us a trajectory, but imagination will lead us to new portals helping us excavate new knowledge. Not in most, but all professions need imagination more than knowledge even by a margin. If we do not imagine, we do not dare to dream and dreams come true when we visualize them. Being a visionary is more important than being erudite. Knowledge comes to those who seek it. The vivid our imagination is, the closer we get to the great truths of the universe because "all great truths are simple".
- In most professions and academic fields, imagination is more important than knowledge.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position yo 16
- In most professions and academic fields, imagination is more important knowledge.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 361, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...onal beings should encourage the absurd, the unorthodox ideas because that is the...
^^
Line 7, column 19, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...s in and among us. The world will be a placate place without the palette of imaginatio...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, look, may, so, still, then, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 58.6224719101 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2097.0 2235.4752809 94% => OK
No of words: 427.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91100702576 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54576487731 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8051738926 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 257.0 215.323595506 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6018735363 0.4932671777 122% => OK
syllable_count: 657.9 704.065955056 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.0578769919 60.3974514979 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.6538461538 118.986275619 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4230769231 23.4991977007 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.84615384615 5.21951772744 35% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.83258426966 207% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0795832540983 0.243740707755 33% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.023073194336 0.0831039109588 28% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0406403721034 0.0758088955206 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.046623789679 0.150359130593 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0251879369873 0.0667264976115 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 14.1392134831 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 48.8420337079 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 12.1743820225 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 100.480337079 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.