In most professions and academic fields, imagination is more important than knowledge.
In this competitive world, to survive you need to excel. Many say that, humanity has reached a level of excellence. But is it so? In my point of view it has become even more tougher and competitive for our children to prove themselves. Yes, imagination has acted as a key catalyst for realizing our success, but it is not the only one. Imagination and knowledge have been going hand in hand, since humans started their journey on this planet. What would one achieve by just imagining? Can he survive this rapidly changing and demanding world? No one can disagree with the fact that knowledge facilitates imagination.
Firstly, Yes, by imagining you can create your own ideas, you can dream something big and extraordinary. But would it suffice? No one realizes the importance of a dream until it can be materialized. And for that, one needs knowledge. For example, Shah Jahan build the famous monument of love ‘The Taj Mahal’, would it have sufficed if he would have just imagined it, or sketched it on a paper? No one would have known the importance of love, how powerful it could be. Another similar example can be quoted for pyramids. It was because these monuments were built, not just imagined, that they count as wonders of world and dreams of an architect.
Secondly, in today’s professional and academic field, results are more paramount than imaginations. The world is changing so rapidly, that one don’t even realize when a gadget or even an idea becomes obsolete. For example, the mobile manufacturing companies such as Samsung, HTC etc. are continuously on their toes, striving to produce new technologies for ever demanding world. What if they would have just imagined? Without any knowledge of how to fabricate their dreams? Then it would have been nearly impossible for them to survive this precipitating world.
Thirdly, according to the famous quote of Dan Brown, ‘Knowledge grows exponentially. The more we know, the greater our ability to learn, and faster we expand our knowledge base’, which clearly suggests that, increasing our knowledge base facilitates our imagination process. If Graham Bell, wouldn’t have imagined and materialized his dream of telephone, would we have been using smartphones today? I guess everyone knows the answer.
Understandably, only knowledge can’t help us to realize our dreams, its imagination which holds the true power. Take an example of Nokia, they had all the knowledge and resources but still couldn’t survive the onslaught of android system and the power of touch devices. The company which was the epitome of mobile systems, was crushed just because of lack of imagination power.
To sum it up, imagination would always act as a catalyst to our knowledge, would always keep us driven to realize new horizons. There can’t be a discourse about which is more crucial, one can easily conclude that imagination and knowledge are like two pillars of success, you cannot stand without having the other.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-05 | samruddh_shah | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-02 | sukhada11 | 62 | view |
| 2019-11-01 | aniketnichat | 50 | view |
| 2019-10-13 | shahryar2222 | 50 | view |
| 2019-09-10 | fernanf | 50 | view |
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be 83
- A nation should require all its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college rather than allow schools in different parts of the nation to determine which academic courses to offer. 50
- College students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure to ad 85
- A nation should require all its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college rather than allow schools in different parts of the nation to determine which academic courses to offer. 50
- Claim: Researchers should not limit their investigations to only those areas in which they expect to discover something that has an immediate, practical application.Reason: It is impossible to predict the outcome of a line of research with any certainty.W 65
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 170, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'tougher' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: tougher
... In my point of view it has become even more tougher and competitive for our children to pro...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 555, Rule ID: AGREE_WITH_THE_FACT[1]
Message: Use simply 'disagree that'.
Suggestion: disagree that
...hanging and demanding world? No one can disagree with the fact that knowledge facilitates imagination. F...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 26, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... architect. Secondly, in today's professional and academic field, results...
^^
Line 5, column 211, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ze when a gadget or even an idea becomes obsolete. For example, the mobile manufa...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'first', 'firstly', 'if', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'still', 'then', 'third', 'thirdly', 'for example', 'i guess', 'such as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.206030150754 0.240241500013 86% => OK
Verbs: 0.174204355109 0.157235817809 111% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0502512562814 0.0880659088768 57% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0569514237856 0.0497285424764 115% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0770519262982 0.0444667217837 173% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.0938023450586 0.12292977631 76% => OK
Participles: 0.0502512562814 0.0406280797675 124% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.91518022058 2.79330140395 104% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0201005025126 0.030933414821 65% => OK
Particles: 0.00167504187605 0.0016655270985 101% => OK
Determiners: 0.0686767169179 0.0997080785238 69% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.035175879397 0.0249443105267 141% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0150753768844 0.0148568991511 101% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3019.0 2732.02544248 111% => OK
No of words: 490.0 452.878318584 108% => OK
Chars per words: 6.1612244898 6.0361032391 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70488508055 4.58838876751 103% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.363265306122 0.366273622748 99% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.287755102041 0.280924506359 102% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.212244897959 0.200843997647 106% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.14693877551 0.132149295362 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91518022058 2.79330140395 104% => OK
Unique words: 269.0 219.290929204 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548979591837 0.48968727796 112% => OK
Word variations: 67.0332358362 55.4138127331 121% => OK
How many sentences: 33.0 20.6194690265 160% => OK
Sentence length: 14.8484848485 23.380412469 64% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.5235435914 59.4972553346 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.4848484848 141.124799967 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.8484848485 23.380412469 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.424242424242 0.674092028746 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.94800884956 121% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.21349557522 77% => OK
Readability: 43.6239950526 51.4728631049 85% => OK
Elegance: 1.13586956522 1.64882698954 69% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165671030815 0.391690518653 42% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0560194331141 0.123202303941 45% => Sentence sentence coherence is low.
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0664032701763 0.077325440228 86% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.402144963336 0.547984918172 73% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.152217100766 0.149214159877 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0517245253286 0.161403998019 32% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0576379924276 0.0892212321368 65% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.27876057476 0.385218514788 72% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.052348745664 0.0692045440612 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11097744952 0.275328986314 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0466270551662 0.0653680567796 71% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.4325221239 144% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.30420353982 94% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 13.0 4.88274336283 266% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 12.0 7.22455752212 166% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.66592920354 109% => OK
Neutral topic words: 8.0 2.70907079646 295% => OK
Total topic words: 24.0 13.5995575221 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.