Musicians only gets recognition and praise after their death.
Real talent of popular musicians are generally appreciated before their death. The statement that their talent is not appreciated till their demise is false. Fame interfering in the honest assessment is also untrue as fame is only the result after honest assessment of their talent. I strongly reject the above statement with providing evidence of Beethoven, A.R Rahaman, and Marshmello.
Beethoven was one of the greatest musician that world would ever get. From the young age, his music started to be highly praised. He was considered a irreplaceable gem in the musician community really early before his death. He also earnt good amount of wealth from it. So his death was also considered great loss to the musician community worldwide.
A.R Rahaman is another highly talent musician who is often praised for his heavenly creation. With monetary success in his career he had received prestigious grammy award also. His music is recognized worldwide despite him being from asia and has very strong fan base.
Marshmello, a pioneer in modern music - specially in edms, is currently favorite artist of many young people. Versatile in his art form, we find variation in this creations o. His huge monetary success and fame matches in talent and also inspires ne w generation to pursue similar career according to their interests.
Above case of three talented musicians from history to present they are all praised highly when alive. It also shows they have accumulated good amount of wealth in their lifetime form using their talent. They gain good fame also. So, to say real talent of popular musicians are generally appreciated after their death would be false.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-24 | Yam Kumar Oli | 62 | view |
| 2023-02-15 | Yam Kumar Oli | 75 | view |
| 2022-11-13 | villian7 | 50 | view |
| 2020-05-29 | aasthagautam95@gmail.com | 79 | view |
| 2017-11-27 | zenith222 | 83 | view |
- The tufted groundhog lives in the coastal wetlands of West Lansburg Ancient records suggest that the tufted groundhog once numbered in the millions Since they were declared a wildlife sanctuary in 2004 development along the coastal wetlands has been pr 16
- Young people enjoy life more than old people 60
- R robustus 76
- The increasingly rapid pace of life today causes more problems than it solves 58
- Musicians only gets recognition and praise after their death 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 362, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: R
...with providing evidence of Beethoven, A.R Rahaman, and Marshmello. Beethoven w...
^
Line 3, column 149, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...to be highly praised. He was considered a irreplaceable gem in the musician commu...
^
Line 5, column 3, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: R
... the musician community worldwide. A.R Rahaman is another highly talent musici...
^
Line 5, column 172, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...e had received prestigious grammy award also. His music is recognized worldwide desp...
^^^^
Line 7, column 159, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...e in his art form, we find variation in this creations o. His huge monetary success ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 225, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...using their talent. They gain good fame also. So, to say real talent of popular musi...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, really, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 12.4196629213 16% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 14.8657303371 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 58.6224719101 65% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1403.0 2235.4752809 63% => OK
No of words: 272.0 442.535393258 61% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15808823529 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.55969084622 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57789071445 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 215.323595506 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.577205882353 0.4932671777 117% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 704.065955056 63% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 23.0359550562 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.4798046708 60.3974514979 44% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 73.8421052632 118.986275619 62% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.3157894737 23.4991977007 61% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.05263157895 5.21951772744 20% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256607004148 0.243740707755 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0768424729063 0.0831039109588 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0760981304081 0.0758088955206 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133848087637 0.150359130593 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0794355541506 0.0667264976115 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 14.1392134831 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 48.8420337079 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 12.1743820225 72% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 100.480337079 65% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 11.2143820225 68% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.