A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
The statement recommends that all the students should strictly learn the same curriculum before they enter university. I cannot completely agree with this viewpoint.
Admittedly, the unique national curriculum is easier for the holding of the teaching activities and administration, since all the subjects are based on the standard criteria. In this case, students can get sufficient training in those compulsory subjects and are more likely to get satisfied scores in the exams. For instance, before the College Entrance Examination, the Chinese Students are trained to solve problems in the obligatory modules for more than thousand times so that they are already very familiar with the exams. However, this kind of mechanical teaching model may lead to another problem. Students are only told to study the national curriculum and aiming at getting better scores and entering prestigeous university, but most of them didn't think about their true interests. After the national examination they are required to choose their ideal major and university. But lacking of thinking about their interests and talent, a great proportion of them may find no passion in their undergraduate's study. The national curriculum delay the choice that the student should make for their life---to choose their major and career path.
It is sound to claim that the national curriculum would benefit the standard admission of universities. Tertiary institutes only need to choose from the candidates according to their results of examination. But, it's not sensible to believe that the ability to prepare for the test is the most important competence required for better performance, both in research and other fields. As far as I am concerned, the love for one's major would be at least another significant factor. So, it may not be fair enough to restrict the students only to study the same curriculum. What is needed may be a better admission procedure according to different curriculums that the high school students chose.
Moreover, I know we cannot think about every country samely. For example, the populations in China are too huge, which would be more difficult for tertiary admission if all high school students create their own curriculum as prefer, but I still recommend that they should have chance to study other extracurriculum and find their love and passion.
Overall, I cannot stand with the viewpoint that all the secondary students can only study the unique curriculum, because it could undermine their diverse individual development.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-18 | Marqueetim | 66 | view |
| 2024-02-04 | sailesh_189 | 50 | view |
| 2024-02-04 | sailesh_189 | 50 | view |
| 2024-02-04 | sailesh_189 | 66 | view |
| 2024-02-04 | sailesh_189 | 50 | view |
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of WLSS television station Over the past year our late night news program has devoted increasingly more time to covering national news and less time to covering weather and local news During the same 68
- Some people believe that traveling to and living in numerous places increases one s ability to relate and connect to other people Others believe that this ability is better cultivated by living in one place and developing a deep understanding of that comm 58
- People s behavior is largely determined by the forces not their own making 50
- Some people argue that successful leaders in government industry or other fields must be highly competitive Other people claim that in order to be successful a leader must be willing and able to cooperate with others 58
- The following is a letter to the editor of the Waymarsh Times Traffic problems here in Waymarsh are obviously reaching record levels While just three months ago it would take me 15 minutes to get to work it now takes closer to 25 Waymarsh should follow th 59
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 459, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a thousand'.
Suggestion: a thousand
...in the obligatory modules for more than thousand times so that they are already very fam...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 752, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...restigeous university, but most of them didnt think about their true interests. After...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, moreover, second, so, still, at least, for example, for instance, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 58.6224719101 73% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2137.0 2235.4752809 96% => OK
No of words: 401.0 442.535393258 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32917705736 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47492842339 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80881044405 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526184538653 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 668.7 704.065955056 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.9489736129 60.3974514979 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.473684211 118.986275619 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1052631579 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.05263157895 5.21951772744 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.331322391384 0.243740707755 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0988158973954 0.0831039109588 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0906062986761 0.0758088955206 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185331952651 0.150359130593 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0588475430772 0.0667264976115 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.8420337079 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.1639044944 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 79.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.