A nation should require all its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college rather than allow schools in different parts of the nation to determine which academic courses to offer.
The knowledge that are taught in school are constantly changing. In a lot of countries, the government and school provides a set of curriculum as examples for teachers to follow. Although following a set of national curriculum may bring some merits to students before they enter college, I believe that a national should not require all of its students to study the same curriculum for several reasons.
First of all, having a set of educational guidelines would help schools and teachers prepare students before they enter college. However, the underlaying question is how strict should the students follow the national curriculum? If a nation requires all students to study the same knowledge, then there will be no diversity in the overall student body. Every student will obtain the same education, thus, no student will be able to learn and share knowledge with each other since they are all taught the same things.
Secondly, it has been proven by research that students tend to excel in the field that they are passionate about. For example, some may be into Language and Art; whereas, others may be more Science and Math focused. If a nation requires all students to take part in the same curriculum, students who wants to focus their studies in Language and Art will not be able to since they need to take classes that are less related to their passion. Therefore, students should be able to choose freely of what they want to study rather than following the same curriculum provided by the nation.
Nevertheless, some may argue that it is more beneficial than not that students study the same curriculum so it gives them fair competition when they enter college. However, by doing so, it will not give students the freedom and chances to discover their interests outside of what is being taught. In order to reach the middle ground, a national should provide suggestions or recommendations of a curriculum for students to follow, but should not require students to follow it completely.
In conclusion, although having a national curriculum would be advantageous for students to learn their knowledge and skills before college, a nation should not require all students to go through the same curriculum. By doing so, it will create more diversity and allows students to focus more on what they want to study. All in all, a nation can provide a set of guidelines as suggestions, but should not take the freedom away from students to choose what study they wish to pursue.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-24 | rookobay | 83 | view |
| 2023-07-19 | LAGADAPATI VINAY | 33 | view |
| 2023-07-14 | zanzendegi | 66 | view |
| 2023-04-06 | poiuy23567 | 66 | view |
| 2023-04-04 | Eeshan | 50 | view |
- A recent study indicates that children living in the Himalayan mountain region in Nepal have lower levels of tooth decay than children living in suburban areas in the United States despite the fact that people in the Himalayan mountain region in Nepal rec 59
- Teachers salaries should be based on their students academic performance Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure to address the most compelling reaso 66
- Schools should do more to prepare students for the non academic aspects of adulthood 50
- The city council of Town X has proposed reducing the city s electric expenses by switching all the lights in public buildings from incandescent bulbs to light emitting diodes LEDs The switch would be made gradually as the old incandescent bulbs burn out a 60
- Young people should be encouraged to pursue long term realistic goals rather than seek immediate fame and recognition 54
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, thus, whereas, for example, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.4196629213 169% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2076.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 419.0 442.535393258 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95465393795 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52432199235 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6613707492 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 215.323595506 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.431980906921 0.4932671777 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 633.6 704.065955056 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6569880044 60.3974514979 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.117647059 118.986275619 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6470588235 23.4991977007 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.11764705882 5.21951772744 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.413787568713 0.243740707755 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.164091907539 0.0831039109588 197% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111646469383 0.0758088955206 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.290770504391 0.150359130593 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0386508060287 0.0667264976115 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 100.480337079 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.